I'm trying to show that [itex]\int d^3x \,x^\mu \left(\partial_\mu \partial_0-g_{\mu 0} \partial^2 \right)\phi^2(x)=0 [/itex]. This term represents an addition to a component of the energy-momentum tensor [itex]\theta_{\mu 0} [/itex] of a scalar field and I want to show that this does not change the dilation operator [itex]D=\int d^3 x \, x^\mu \theta_{\mu 0} [/itex](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

What I have is that:

$$

\int d^3x \,x^\mu \left(\partial_\mu \partial_0-g_{\mu 0} \partial^2 \right)\phi^2(x)=\int d^3x \left[ \,x^j \left(\partial_j \partial_0 \right)\phi^2(x) +x^0\nabla^2\phi^2(x) \right]

$$

and I can argue that the 2nd term is zero, since x_{0}can be pulled out of the integral, and you are integrating a divergence and because boundary conditions are periodic, this term is zero. But I can't argue that the first term is zero. Is there a simple reason that the 1st term is zero? We are not allowed to use anything like equations of motions for the fields.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Improved energy-momentum tensor changing dilation operator

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**