Impulse and momentum / work-energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of impulse, momentum, and the work-energy theorem in the context of a problem involving a car's deceleration and the forces acting on it during a collision. The original poster is attempting to understand why their calculated average force differs from the expected answer.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the average force using the relationship between force, momentum, and time, but questions the validity of their approach after comparing it with a solution based on the work-energy theorem.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made about the time duration of the force application and suggest that the average velocity should be considered instead of the initial velocity for calculating time.
  • Others discuss the implications of defining average force in terms of displacement versus time, raising concerns about clarity and consistency in terminology.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, providing insights into the correct application of concepts. There is a recognition of the need to clarify assumptions regarding average force and the conditions under which different calculations yield the same results. No explicit consensus has been reached, but productive avenues for understanding are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between average force calculated over time versus displacement, highlighting potential misunderstandings in the problem setup. The original poster's calculations are based on an assumption of constant force, which is being scrutinized.

GoonP
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A car moving at 70km/h collides rams into an immobile steel wall. Its front of the is
compressed by 0.94m . What average force must a seat belt exert in order to restrain
a 75-kg passenger?
Relevant Equations
F = \frac{dp}{dt}
Hello, I am wondering why this take at a solution is wrong.

So basically, $F = \frac{dp}{dt} \Rightarrow F = m\frac{dv}{dt} \Rightarrow F_{\text{avg}}\Delta t = m \Delta v$. Quick conversions show that 70 km/hr = 19.4 m/s, and therefore $\Delta t = \frac{0.94}{19.4} = 0.04845$. Therefore, the answer I am getting is $\frac{75 \cdot 19.4}{0.04845} \approx 30 \text{kN}$ which is exactly double the correct answer.

The solution I have access too uses the fact that $F_{\text{avg}} = \frac{\Delta E}{\Delta x}$ which i can understand is a basic consequence of work energy theorem, and substituting kinetic energy for $E$ it is easy to see mathematically why it is half my answer.

Any guidance as to why my initial approach is incorrect?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome!

Consider that while the front of the car is being compressed by 0.94 m, its velocity is simultaneously and uniformly reduced from 70 km/h to zero.
Therefore, your calculated time is too short.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21
Oh ok that makes sense. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Please use two \$$ to bracket LaTeX expressions. Click on "LaTeX Guide", lower left for more useful informaton about using LaTeX on this site.
The expression $$F = \frac{dp}{dt} \rightarrow F = m\frac{dv}{dt} \rightarrow F_{\text{avg}}\Delta t = m \Delta v$$ is appropriate for finding the average force if you know ##\Delta t## which you don't. In that case you have to make the additional assumption that the force is constant. The solution you have does that and calculates the work done by that force and averages over distance.

You could have gotten the same answer if you found ##\Delta t## by dividing ##\Delta x## not by the initial velocity ##v_0## but by the average velocity ##v_{\text{avg}}=\frac{1}{2}(v_0+0).## That's where your missing factor of 2 is. The answers are the same because the average velocity is calculated under the assumption that the acceleration (and hence the force) is constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and MatinSAR
One can dispense with the uniform acceleration requirement if one decides to creatively interpret the "average" force as an average over displacement rather than as an average over time. The two averages can differ in general. If the deceleration is constant, they will match.

We have a force that acts on the passenger over a known displacement while doing a known amount of work.

The average (over displacement) force is defined as $$\frac {\int f(s) \cdot ds}{\int ds} = \frac{\int f(s) \cdot ds}{\Delta s}$$ The work done is given by ##\int f(s) \cdot ds##. We know initial and final kinetic energies for the passenger, so we know the work done. That gives us the numerator of the fraction. We are given the total displacement, ##\Delta s##. So we know the denominator of the fraction.

With this method, the factor of ##\frac{1}{2}## comes from the formula for kinetic energy: ##KE=\frac{1}{2}mv^2##.
 
jbriggs444 said:
One can dispense with the uniform acceleration requirement if one decides to creatively interpret the "average" force as an average over displacement rather than as an average over time.
While it is technically true that one can choose to define an average wrt one or another variable, it is highly misleading to intend average force as being wrt displacement without saying so. The default meaning of "average force" has to be average wrt time in order to be consistent with the default meaning of average acceleration. When did you last see a question asking for average acceleration wrt distance? Educators should know better.
That said, I cannot think what the practical value could be of computing an average force. In the real world, we care about momentum, energy and forces exceeding thresholds. So maybe no great harm done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
762
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
997
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K