In an experiment, do we measure the eigenvalue or expectation value?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of eigenvalues and expectation values in quantum mechanics, exploring their definitions, implications, and the relationship between measured outcomes and quantum states. The scope includes conceptual clarifications and technical reasoning related to quantum measurements and wavefunctions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that measurements always yield eigenvalues, while the expectation value represents an average that may not correspond to any specific eigenvalue.
  • One participant uses the analogy of a die to illustrate how eigenvalues correspond to possible outcomes, while the expectation value can be a non-possible outcome, such as 3.5 from rolling a die.
  • Questions arise regarding the ability to infer the quantum state from a measured eigenvalue, with some suggesting that the quantum state can only be known post-measurement if there is no degeneracy.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of measuring sums of outcomes from multiple throws, noting that certain outcomes can lead to ambiguity in determining individual states.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between eigenvalues and expectation values, as well as the ability to infer quantum states from measurements. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about quantum states and the implications of degeneracy in measurements, which are not fully explored or resolved in the discussion.

touqra
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
In an experiment, do we measure the eigenvalue or the expectation value ? If both can be measured, how can we distinguish one from another ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When we make a measurement, we will always measure an eigenvalue. If we start with a system which wasn't in an eigenstate to begin with, however, it's not sure which eigenvalue we measure. The expectation value is sort of an average; it doesn't even have to be an eigenvalue.

Favorite example: consider an ordinary die with six sides numbered one through six. If we throw it, we can get 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6; these correspond to the eigenvalues of the observable we're measuring in QM. If the chance to get each outcome is the same (that is, 1/6), the expectation value would be
1/6(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6) = 3,5.
Note that this is not a possible outcome. Instead, if we would make many many throws (theoretically, infinitely many) then the average of the outcomes would be 3.5 (and if not, the die would be flawed :smile:)
 
CompuChip said:
When we make a measurement, we will always measure an eigenvalue. If we start with a system which wasn't in an eigenstate to begin with, however, it's not sure which eigenvalue we measure. The expectation value is sort of an average; it doesn't even have to be an eigenvalue.

Favorite example: consider an ordinary die with six sides numbered one through six. If we throw it, we can get 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6; these correspond to the eigenvalues of the observable we're measuring in QM. If the chance to get each outcome is the same (that is, 1/6), the expectation value would be
1/6(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6) = 3,5.
Note that this is not a possible outcome. Instead, if we would make many many throws (theoretically, infinitely many) then the average of the outcomes would be 3.5 (and if not, the die would be flawed :smile:)

So, how about the wavefunction? Say, I want to measure the Hamiltonian outcome (eigenvalue) of a quantum state (wavefunction). From the measured energy, can I infer the quantum state? Or is the state really just some theoretical construct, which can have absolutely no means of being determined its value from experiments?
 
touqra said:
So, how about the wavefunction? Say, I want to measure the Hamiltonian outcome (eigenvalue) of a quantum state (wavefunction). From the measured energy, can I infer the quantum state? Or is the state really just some theoretical construct, which can have absolutely no means of being determined its value from experiments?

You can never infer completely what the quantum state was before your measurement but you know what the quantum state is just after your measurement if there is no degeneracy (at least in the context of the Copenhagen interpretation).
 
To continue my earlier analogy (yes, I know continuing analogies is dangerous because the analogy will stop at some point): suppose I have some construct where I can only read of the sum of n throws.
For one throw, the sum is exactly the outcome of my throw, so I can unambiguously say how many eyes I had (but nothing about earlier throws). If I throw twice (or two dice at the same time) and the sum is 2 or 12, I also know the values of the separate dice unambiguously, but for example the outcome 6 is degenerate (could be (1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3), (4, 2) or (5, 1), which is 5 or 3 possibilities depending on whether I can discern the dice).

So depending on the system, the eigenvalue will or will not tell you what the state is/was, but it will usually at least narrow down the possibilities.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K