Suppose we have a statement (say an equation) P(n, m), and we want to prove it works for arbitrary n and m.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Either

(1) It is sufficient to define Q(n) = P(n,m) or R(m) = P(n,m) and prove either Q(n) or R(m) by induction

(2) It is necessary to prove that P(n,m) => P(n+1,m) and P(n, m) => P(n, m+1), in addition to the base cases, to show that it works for arbitrary n and m.

Which one is correct !?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Induction with more than one variable

Loading...

Similar Threads - Induction more variable | Date |
---|---|

A Nonlinear regression in two or more independent variables | Jul 6, 2017 |

I Sets, Subsets, Possible Relations | Feb 23, 2017 |

I Can you use proof by contradiction in the midst of induction | Mar 21, 2016 |

Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning | Oct 15, 2015 |

Why is induction rigorous? | Sep 16, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**