Inductive Effect: Why Does Charge Decrease?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karan Punjabi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the inductive effect in organic chemistry, specifically regarding the decreasing positive charge on carbon atoms in a chain, such as in n-pentyl chloride. The highly electronegative chlorine atom induces a partial positive charge on the adjacent carbon (A), which diminishes on subsequent carbons (B, C, etc.) due to the weaker nature of the charge transfer. The partial positive charge on carbon A is influenced by chlorine's electronegativity, while the charges on B and C are significantly weaker and often negligible beyond three to four carbon atoms due to the diminishing inductive effect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inductive effect in organic chemistry
  • Knowledge of electronegativity and its role in charge distribution
  • Familiarity with carbon chain structures and bonding
  • Basic concepts of partial charges and electron sharing
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the inductive effect in greater detail using examples from organic compounds
  • Explore the concept of electronegativity and its impact on molecular polarity
  • Investigate the behavior of charge distribution in longer carbon chains
  • Learn about resonance and its differences from inductive effects in organic molecules
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and anyone interested in understanding charge distribution and inductive effects in molecular structures.

Karan Punjabi
Messages
127
Reaction score
3
Guys, I just understand that what is inductive effect but I'm not getting the reason that why as chain increases the positive charges on each carbon atom after 3 or 4 bonds decreases or becomes negligible?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Not sure what the question is.
 
Dr. Courtney said:
Not sure what the question is.
Consider n-pentyl chloride on 1 carbon atom which is attached to chlorine atom there is a partial positive charge and on second carbon atom it is said that there is less positive charge and as we move further we get more less positive charge. So why?
 
Lets name the carbons to make it easier. The carbon attached to chlorine is A, the next one B... and so on.

Now the positive charge on A is generated by highly EN chlorine. It is not a complete positive charge mind you, because the electron pairs A shares with B compensate for this charge. Now the partial shifting of the electron pair A-B (electron pairs shared by A and B) towards generates a partial negative charge on B. This charge will be smaller than that on A because it is not generated due to a highly EN atom, but by another partial positive charge (which itself is weak). From B to C, the charge decreases further and we generally neglect inductive effect after 3-4 carbons.
 
CrazyNinja said:
Lets name the carbons to make it easier. The carbon attached to chlorine is A, the next one B... and so on.

Now the positive charge on A is generated by highly EN chlorine. It is not a complete positive charge mind you, because the electron pairs A shares with B compensate for this charge. Now the partial shifting of the electron pair A-B (electron pairs shared by A and B) towards generates a partial negative charge on B. This charge will be smaller than that on A because it is not generated due to a highly EN atom, but by another partial positive charge (which itself is weak). From B to C, the charge decreases further and we generally neglect inductive effect after 3-4 carbons.
I understood you but I was going for the fact that the partial positive charge on Carbon A is having the same capacity to attract shared pairs of electrons as chlorine atom because the partial positive charge is generated due to chlorine.
 
Sorry for the delay in answering.

Yes you are right that chlorine generates the partial positive charge. But this charge is not as strong as chlorine because its effect is suppressed by the movement of bond pair A-B. Chlorine can attract shared pairs as it is its fundamental property (being so EN). Carbon is attracting only because it has a partial charge. This charge is not sufficient enough to polarise carbon B as much as chlorine polarises carbon A.
 
That means there are two factors for carbon i.e its electronegativity and positive charge on it
 
Yes. But its own EN doesent olay a role when it is bonded to another carbon. C-C bonds don't have polarity.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K