Inelastic collisions with constant momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of kinetic energy in inelastic collisions, specifically questioning why the expected answer of 1/2 mv² is not achieved. Participants agree that the book's phrasing about "identical objects" may be misleading, as only objects of the same mass are necessary for the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in terminology, suggesting that "identical objects" could imply additional conditions like equal charges. The confusion stems from the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the reference to "the same two objects" from a previous question. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the need for precise language in physics texts to avoid misunderstandings.
haha0p1
Messages
46
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
The total momentum before the collision in an inelastic collisions is 0, but the total kinetic energy before the collision is 1/2mv². Calculate how the total kinetic energy before collision is 1/2mv².
Relevant Equations
Ek=1/2mv²
Kinetic energy before collision =1/2 mv² + 1/2 mv² = mv² (since energy is a scalar quantity, the direction does not matter). Kindly tell why am I not getting the required answer i.e: 1/2 mv². Am I doing the calculation wrong?
IMG_20230102_154827.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

I agree with your calculation. An unfortunate error in the book.

##\ ##
 
It's interesting that the book specifies the "same object" or "identical" objects, where all that is required kinematically is objects of the same mass!
 
PeroK said:
It's interesting that the book specifies the "same object" or "identical" objects, where all that is required kinematically is objects of the same mass!
Truee
 
PeroK said:
It's interesting that the book specifies the "same object" or "identical" objects, where all that is required kinematically is objects of the same mass!
I think it's economy of words. "Identical objects" is shorter than "objects of the same mass" and conveys the idea of symmetry. "Identical" becomes relatively conciser when the masses also carry equal charges.
 
PeroK said:
It's interesting that the book specifies the "same object"
No, it says "the same two objects". Presumably the same two as in the preceding question.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top