Inequalities of rational expressions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the inequalities of rational expressions, specifically addressing the condition under which the inequality \(\frac{a}{b}<\frac{c}{d}\) implies \(ad PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of rational expressions and inequalities
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Familiarity with solving inequalities
  • Basic concepts of positive and negative numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inequalities involving rational expressions
  • Learn how to solve rational inequalities by finding common denominators
  • Explore the implications of sign analysis in rational expressions
  • Practice solving various types of rational inequalities with different conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone studying algebra who seeks to deepen their understanding of rational expressions and inequalities.

delsoo
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
referring to the photo attached, can anyone expalin and give suitable numerical example please? i couldn't understand the notes.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0001~2[1].jpg
    DSC_0001~2[1].jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 391
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We know that

[tex]\frac{a}{b}=\frac{c}{d}[/tex]

implies ##ad = cb##. Indeed, to prove it, we multiply both sides of the equation with ##bd##.

The question is now whether [tex]\frac{a}{b}<\frac{c}{d}[/tex]

implies ##ad < cb##.

The answer is no. Indeed, we know that

[tex]\frac{-1}{-1} < \frac{2}{1}[/tex]

but it is not true that ##(-1)\cdot 1 < 2\cdot (-1)##. In fact, it is the reverse inequality that holds.

So the rule

[tex]\frac{a}{b}<\frac{c}{d}~\Rightarrow~ad<bc[/tex]

is only true if ##b,d>0##.

So if you have something to solve like

[tex]\frac{x+1}{x+2}< \frac{x}{x-3}[/tex]

then you cannot solve this by cross-multiplying, that is you cannot say that

[tex](x+1)(x-3)<x(x+2)[/tex]

because ##x+2## and ##x-3## might be negative. Now, if you know that it's positive, then you can do it, but you don't know this in general.

The way to solve it is to bring both to the same side, so the above is equivalent to

[tex]\frac{x}{x-3} - \frac{x+1}{x+2} > 0[/tex]

and thus

[tex]\frac{x(x+2) - (x+1)(x-3)}{(x-3)(x+2)}>0[/tex]

So we get that a fraction is positive. This can only happen in two situations:

1) Both numerator and denominator are positive. So the above implies
[tex]x(x+2)>(x+1)(x-3)~\text{and}~(x-3)(x+2)>0[/tex]

Solving this yields possible values of ##x## which solve the inequality, but they are not the only solutions:

2) Both numerator and denominator are negative. So we get

[tex]x(x+2)<(x+1)(x-3)~\text{and}~(x-3)(x+2)<0[/tex]

Solving this also yields solutions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 171 ·
6
Replies
171
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K