MHB Inequality Challenge: Prove $x$ for $x>0$

anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove $x+x^9+x^{25}<1+x^4+x^{16}+x^{36}$ for $x>0$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let's see if my head is fully back in the game.

Let's look at [math]f(x) = x^{36} - x^{25} + x^{16} - x^9 + x^4 - x + 1[/math]

For x = 0, f(0) = 1.

For 0 < x < 1:
[math]x^{36} - (x^{25} - x^{16} ) - (x^9 - x^4) - (x - 1) > 0[/math] because each term inside the parentheses are negative.

For 1 < x
[math](x^{36} - x^{25}) + (x^{16} - x^9) + (x^4 - x) + 1 > 0[/math] because every term inside the parentheses are positive.

Therefore f(x) has no real zeros on 0 < x.

[math]x^{36} - x^{25} + x^{16} - x^9 + x^4 - x + 1 > 0 \implies x^{36} + x^{16} + x^4 + 1 > x^{25} + x^9 + x[/math] on 0 < x.

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top