Infimum and supremum of empty set

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter strobeda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Empty Set Supremum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The infimum (inf) of the empty set (∅) is defined as infinity (∞), while the supremum (sup) of the empty set is defined as negative infinity (-∞). This definition is necessary to maintain consistency in calculations involving subsets. If inf∅ were defined as a finite number, it would lead to contradictions when calculating the infimum of sets that include the empty set. Therefore, defining inf∅ as ∞ and sup∅ as -∞ effectively resolves these issues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts, particularly infimum and supremum.
  • Familiarity with mathematical notation and definitions related to limits.
  • Basic knowledge of subsets and their properties.
  • Concept of infinity in mathematical contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of infimum and supremum in real analysis.
  • Study the implications of defining limits in set theory.
  • Explore examples of subsets and their infimum/supremum calculations.
  • Learn about the role of infinity in mathematical definitions and proofs.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced mathematics, and anyone interested in set theory and its foundational concepts.

strobeda
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I can't wrap my mind around this:

inf∅= ∞
sup∅= - ∞

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
inf∅ is artificially defined to be ∞ so that inf will work well. Suppose we had defined inf∅ = 998 and we had a set with one element, 999. Then we want inf({999}) = 999. But since ∅ is also a subset of {999}, we would have inf({999}) = inf∅ = 998. The only way to avoid this problem is to make inf∅ greater than any possible number. So inf∅ = ∞. Similarly we have to define sup∅ smaller than any possible number. So sup∅ = -∞.

In a sense, this is just getting ∅ out of the way of the calculation of inf and sup.
 
Indeed, it gets ∅ out of the way!

Thank you very much, FactChecker!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K