I Infinite flow with capillary tubes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the capillary tube phenomenon and its implications for infinite water flow. The idea of creating an infinite loop by bending a second tube into a first raises questions about conservation of energy. However, it is clarified that surface tension must overcome gravity for flow to occur. If surface tension is strong enough to lift the water, it will prevent drainage, negating the possibility of infinite flow. Ultimately, the concept of a perpetual motion machine remains impossible due to these physical limitations.
Warp
Messages
139
Reaction score
15
I was watching this YouTube video by the channel The Action Lab:

At one point it shows this capillary tube phenomenon:

capillary_tubes.jpg


It got me immediately thinking: Conservation of energy much?

What's stopping that second tube from being bent into draining into the leftmost tube, thus creating an infinite loop of flowing water, which ought to be impossible because conservation of energy and stuff? If that were done, would there be some other phenomenon stopping the infinite flow of liquid? A perpetual motion machine shouldn't be possible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Warp said:
A perpetual motion machine shouldn't be possible
It isn’t.

If the surface tension is stronger than gravity to lift it up then it is strong enough to keep it from draining. There will not be any flow
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, Vanadium 50, Bystander and 2 others
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »

Thread 'Off resonance driving of a MW/RF cavity'

Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
View full post »

Similar threads

How does capillary action of a liquid not violate energy conservation?
Replies
19
Views
2K
Using capillary action to raise water (Is perpetual flow possible?)
Replies
22
Views
55K
The Capillary Action of Gasoline: Debunking the Gravity-based Siphon Theory
Replies
31
Views
6K
I Mining the Universe's expansion?
Replies
25
Views
3K
I Energy conservation in Doppler (NOT cosmological) redshifts?
Replies
13
Views
3K
I Toppling a Hemisphere: Solving for Kinetic Energy in a Delicate Collision
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Conservation of energy in Everett's MWI
Replies
38
Views
3K
I Time travel is a fact or fiction.?
Replies
9
Views
3K
A Few questions about how a refrigerator works
Replies
13
Views
4K
Ballistocardiograph and conservation of momentum
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top