The Capillary Action of Gasoline: Debunking the Gravity-based Siphon Theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BadBrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Challenge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the mechanics of siphoning liquids, specifically gasoline, and critiques the long-standing definition of a siphon as reliant on atmospheric pressure. Participants, including Dr. Stephen Hughes from Queensland University of Technology, argue that capillary action plays a crucial role in the siphoning process. The discussion highlights that gravity alone cannot explain the upward movement of liquid in a siphon, as evidenced by the behavior of juice boxes and the differing properties of liquids like gasoline and ethanol. Ultimately, the consensus is that capillary action, combined with hydrostatic pressure differences, is essential for understanding siphon dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of siphon mechanics and fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of capillary action and surface tension
  • Familiarity with hydrostatic pressure principles
  • Basic physics concepts related to liquid behavior under pressure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of capillary action in various liquids
  • Study the effects of hydrostatic pressure on fluid dynamics
  • Examine the differences in siphoning behavior between gasoline and ethanol
  • Explore practical experiments to demonstrate siphoning mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, fluid dynamics researchers, engineers, and anyone interested in the scientific principles behind siphoning liquids.

  • #31


I think a 10m+ siphon would work, just very slowly. The top of the tube would be full of water vapor instead of liquid.

Suppose the source body has a surface elevation of 10 meters, the tube goes up 20 meters and then down 30 meters to the destination body. Water travels up 10 meters from the source as liquid, then vaporizes. It then travels up another 10 meters and down 20 as vapor. It condenses 10 meters above the destination body. The weight of 10m of liquid + 20m of vapor > 10m liquid + 10m vapor so the siphon keeps going.

May be tricky to get started.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


SAFETY WARNING: Isopropyl Alcohol is toxic and must not be swallowed, nor inhaled, nor allowed contact with the eyes. I only got a little in my mouth, and spat it out and rinsed my mouth immediately.

***

I've just performed my experiment:

I used a store-bought 91% solution of isopropyl alcohol, a miniature (2 oz) martini glass as my donor tank, a miniature (2ox) gravy boat as my receptor tank, and a straw from a juice box for my hose (yes, I actually bought one just for this experiment).

Observations: having initiated flow via oral suction, flow continued as long as the mouth of the short end of the straw remained submerged beneath the surface of the liquid within the donor tank.

Measurements Taken: HEY, C'MON! I was working with tiny little glass vessels and a tiny little drinking straw that I could hardly hold in my hands. If want measurements, YOU take them!

Conclusions (keeping in mind my "Possible Sources of Error" discussion below):

1) Isopropyl alcohol is capable of being siphoned, thus suggesting that intermolecular hydrogen bonding is neither a significant nor a necessary force for the operation of a siphon system;

2) Isopropyl alcohol tastes terrible!

Possible Sources of Error:

!) The physical-chemical properties of ethyl alcohol and isopropyl alcohol may differ with regard to intermolecular attraction;

2) The 9% H2O content may have provided sufficient intermolecular hydrogen bonding to maintain the flow (although it wasn't a drip, but a good, strong flow).

***

Now I'll spend the rest of my life looking in vain for a laboratory that will have me!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
17K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
55K
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K