Infinite potential well problem normalization

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the normalization of the infinite potential well problem in quantum physics. A participant shares their attempts at solving a fraction problem but realizes their calculations are incorrect, prompting requests for help from others. There is an emphasis on the importance of making a best attempt before seeking assistance, as per homework guidelines. After several exchanges, one participant successfully resolves the fraction issue and expresses gratitude for the help received, reflecting on their earlier mistakes. The conversation highlights the challenges of mastering complex concepts while dealing with simple errors.
Ashish Somwanshi
Messages
31
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Suppose an electron in an infinite potential well with width, L, has a wavefunction,
ϕ(z)=Az(z−L) for 0<z<L
Normalize this wavefunction and derive an expression for the constant A in terms of L.
Relevant Equations
∫|ψ(x,t)|^2dx=1, integral lower bound: minus infinity
Upper bound: positive infinity
I have attached my attempt and proof that my attempts were incorrect.
 

Attachments

  • images.jpeg
    images.jpeg
    31.6 KB · Views: 162
  • Screenshot_20221002_231727.jpg
    Screenshot_20221002_231727.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 145
  • Homework attempt.pdf
    Homework attempt.pdf
    663.8 KB · Views: 141
  • Screenshot_20221002_234217.jpg
    Screenshot_20221002_234217.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 134
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the homework guidelines you must make your best attempt at this before we can help.
 
PeroK said:
According to the homework guidelines you must make your best attempt at this before we can help.
 

Attachments

Your method is fine. Double check your final calculations- using ##60## as a common denominator, perhaps.
 
PeroK said:
Your method is fine. Double check your final calculations- using ##60## as a common denominator, perhaps.
Yeah, dosen't work. Please do provide your solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ashish Somwanshi said:
Yeah, dosen't work. Plz do provide your solution.
Screenshot_20221002_233441.jpg
 
Ashish Somwanshi said:
Yeah, dosen't work. Plz do provide your solution.
This is my final attempt despite using 60 as common denominator.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221002_234217.jpg
    Screenshot_20221002_234217.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 148
Ashish Somwanshi said:
This is my final attempt despite using 60 as common denominator.
Okay, let's try this again. ##\dfrac{1}{5} - \dfrac{2}{4} + \dfrac{1}{3}## is what?

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
topsquark said:
Okay, let's try this again. ##\dfrac{1}{5} - \dfrac{2}{4} + \dfrac{1}{3}## is what?

-Dan
Sorry, I don't understand how to add three fractions using common denominator, in my first attempt I did the old way but still incorrect. Plz do provide the solution if anyone can solve their way. Either the autograder must be faulty or something I must be missing...
 
  • #10
topsquark said:
Okay, let's try this again. ##\dfrac{1}{5} - \dfrac{2}{4} + \dfrac{1}{3}## is what?

-Dan
It's 1/12 according to evaluating two fractions one at a time.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes berkeman
  • #11
Ashish Somwanshi said:
Plz do provide the solution if anyone can solve their way.
No, we do not provide solutions. You really don't understand how to add those fractions? Also, please do not use text speak at PF like "please". Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
  • #12
I will redo the solution as I have made silly mistakes in evaluating the fractions...Thanks for spotting it.
 
  • #13
Ashish Somwanshi said:
I will redo the solution as I have made silly mistakes in evaluating the fractions...Thanks for spotting it.
Guys, Thank you soo much. I've got a passing grade. It is mind boggling to see myself perform childish mistakes doing advanced quantum physics. I am currently analyzing reasons responsible for such performance.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Back
Top