# Infinite potential well with delta well

1. Sep 7, 2015

### bznm

• Missing template due to originally being posted in different forum.
I Have tried to solve a problem about infinite potential well with a delta well in the middle, but I haven't the results and so I can't check if the proceeding is wrong...

My attempt solution:

The Schroedinger's Equation is:

$\psi''(x)=\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} (V(x)-E) \psi (x)$
so we have: $\psi''(x)=-\frac{2m}{\hbar^2} E \psi (x)$
I have assumed $E>0$

Then I have translated the axis origin, and the segment [-a, a] now is [0,2a]

We have two wavefunctions:

$\psi_-=A\sin kx +B\cos kx$ for $0<x<a$
$\psi_+=C\sin kx +D\cos kx$ for $a<x<2a$

Conditions:

- from $\psi_- (0)=0 \rightarrow B=0$
- from$\psi_+ (2a) = 0 \rightarrow \tan(2ka)=-D/C$
- from $\psi_- (a) = \psi_+ (a) \rightarrow \tan(ka)=\frac{D}{A-C}$
- from normalization $A^2=C^2+D^2=1$
- from $\psi_+' (a)=\psi'_- (a)-\frac{2mg}{\hbar^2}\psi(a) \rightarrow kC \cos(ka) - Dk \sin(ka)= Ak \cos(ka)-\frac{2mg}{\hbar^2}A\sin(ka)$

I've tried substituting in the last relation the previous relations but I couldn't get to the result...

2. Sep 7, 2015

### Orodruin

Staff Emeritus
I suggest that you do not make the translation to the interval [0,2a]. The original problem is symmetric around x=0 and therefore has eigenfunctions which are either symmetric or anti-symmetric.

3. Sep 7, 2015

### bznm

I have done the translation because my texbook, dealing with the infinite well, explicitly says "In order to avoid different steps for odd and even eigenfunctions, we choose the coordinates origin in one of the extreme points of the segment" and so does in the next steps.. So I have thought to do the same thing... But maybe I can't to do it because of the delta function? Do I have to consider even and odd solution because of the delta?

4. Sep 7, 2015

### Avodyne

You can do it with the shifted interval.

Your normalization condition is wrong. And it won't be needed in any case, it doesn't help you find the spectrum.

Your assumption E>0 is not necessarily correct. You should consider E>0 and E<0 separately.

You should consider the cases $\psi(a)=0$ and $\psi(a)\ne 0$ separately.

Then, your goal is to eliminate $A, B, C, D$ and get an equation involving $ka$ only. The equation you get does not necessarily have an analytic solution, and then needs to be studied graphically. (If you've seen the finite square-well problem, you have probably seen this technique.)

Last edited: Sep 7, 2015
5. Sep 7, 2015

### vela

Staff Emeritus
You can do it either way, but given the symmetry of the problem, I'd stick with the original interval.

One trick to make the math a bit simpler is to use wave functions of the form $\psi_+ = A \sin k(x+a)$ and $\psi_+ = B \sin k(x-a)$. These automatically satisfy the boundary conditions at $x = \pm a$.

6. Sep 7, 2015

### bznm

if $\psi(a)=0$, $k=\frac{n \pi}{a}$ (and so I obtain the spectrum.. right?)

if $\psi(a) \neq 0$, $tg ka=\frac{D}{A-C}$...

but I can't find the equation that involves only $ka$.. can you help me?

7. Sep 7, 2015

### bznm

And what about the condition on energy levels?

8. Sep 7, 2015

### vela

Staff Emeritus
What equations do the other two conditions at x=0 give you (for the unshifted well)?

9. Sep 7, 2015

### Avodyne

Yes. In the original unshifted interval, these are the eigenvalues corresponding to the odd-parity eigenfunctions. These are the same as in the box without the delta function. This is because these eigenfunctions vanish at the delta function, and so are unaffected by the delta function.

You already have
Use the first equation to express $D$ in terms of $C$. Plug this into the second equation. Use it to solve for $A$ in terms of $C$. Plug your expressions for $D$ and $A$ into the third equation. Cancel out common factors of $C$. Simplify as much as possible.

10. Sep 11, 2015

### bznm

A lot of thanks!

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted