Infinite series sum of (-1)^n/lnx

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence properties of the infinite series given by the sum from two to infinity of (-1)^n/ln(x). Participants are exploring whether the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various convergence tests, including the Alternating Series Test, comparison tests, and the ratio and root tests. There is uncertainty about how to effectively apply these tests to determine the nature of convergence.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants offering insights into the properties of alternating series and the behavior of the natural logarithm function. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of the Alternating Series Test, but there remains a lack of consensus on how to definitively classify the convergence of the series.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of comparing transcendental functions to algebraic functions and the legality of such comparisons in the context of convergence tests.

JoeTrumpet
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find if the series is absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent.

The sum from two to infinity of (-1)^n/lnx.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to integrate 1/lnx, so that failed. The ratio and root test don't seem to simplify matters any further. I wasn't sure of anyway I could use the comparison test or limit ratio test. I used Alternate Series Test so I at least know that it's convergent, but I don't know if it's conditionally convergent or absolutely convergent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try thinking some more about comparision tests.
 
That is an alternating series (that's crucial) and ln(x) is an increasing function. What does that tell you?
 
Hm, would it be reasonable to say that because n > ln(n) for all n from 2 to infinity, 1/ln(n) > 1/x, which is divergent, thus making 1/ln(n) divergent and the sum from 2 to infinity of ((-1)^n)/ln(n) conditionally convergent? It didn't really occur to me to compare a transcendental function to an algebraic function (if it's even legal, anyway). Thanks for the help (assuming my solution was okay)!
 
Last edited:
Yes, the "alternating series" test says simply that if terms of [itex]\sum a_n[/itex] are alternating in sign and |an| is decreasing, then the series converges. In fact, it is easy to see that, given any N, the entire sum lies between the partial sum up to N and the partial sum up to N+1.
 
But would that test be useful if you're distinguishing between whether something is absolutely convergent or conditionally convergent?
 
It will possibly tell you if it's conditionally convergent. You'll need another test to answer whether is absolutely convergent or not. Something like the integral test or a comparison test.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K