Infinte series sum(n*(1/2)^n,n,k,infty)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cliowa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calculation of the infinite series \(\sum_{n=k}^{\infty} n\cdot \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{n}\) as a function of \(k\). Participants explore various methods for summing this series, including differentiation techniques and the use of geometric series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help in calculating the series and expresses difficulty in finding a pattern or decomposition.
  • Another suggests differentiating the power series to handle the term \(n\cdot x^{n-1}\), while acknowledging convergence issues.
  • Some participants propose treating the series as an Arithmetic-Geometric Series, outlining a method to express it in terms of a geometric series.
  • There is a discussion about the validity of subtracting series and how it leads to a geometric series representation.
  • One participant describes an elementary approach by rewriting the series in a "diagonal form" and summing by columns.
  • Another participant mentions the use of a known formula for the sum of a geometric series to derive results for specific columns of the series.
  • There is a suggestion to differentiate a parameterized geometric series to achieve the result, with a note on convergence conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing preferences for methods of summation, with some advocating for differentiation while others prefer to avoid it. There is no consensus on a single approach, and multiple methods are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of convergence in the context of rearranging series terms, highlighting that commutativity applies only to convergent series.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in series summation techniques, particularly in mathematical contexts involving infinite series and convergence criteria, may find this discussion beneficial.

cliowa
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
How can I calculate the value of this series as a function of k?

<br /> \sum_{n=k}^{\infty} n\cdot \big(\frac{1}{2}\big)^{n}<br />

Plugging in numbers and trying to see a pattern doesn't work for me, I can't see it. I haven't found a way to decompose this sum into several ones where I can see what's going on.
Could anybody help me? It would be appreciated very much.
Thanks in advance

Best regards...Cliowa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can sum x^n, so how about differentiating and summing nx^{n-1}?

we;ll ignore convergence issues and pretend that's ok. (please don't point out that you have n(1/2)^{n} and not n(1/2)^{n-1})
 
matt grime said:
you can sum x^n, so how about differentiating and summing nx^{n-1}?
Yeah, maybe that'd work, but I really have to do it without differentiating!
 
cliowa said:
Yeah, maybe that'd work, but I really have to do it without differentiating!
Why do you have to do it without? If you do it like matt grime says you get \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}nx^{n}=\frac{x}{\left(1-x\right)^{2}}.
 
As Matt and amcavoy pointed out, writing out the power series and then differentiaing it is an easy way.

Otherwise, you could treat this as an Arithmetic-Geometric Series.

So if

S = k (\frac{1}{2})^k + (k+1)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+1} + ...

\frac{S}{2} = k(\frac{1}{2})^{k+1} + (k+1)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+2} + ...

Subtract the two series and you will get a GP.
 
Last edited:
siddharth said:
So if
S = k (\frac{1}{2})^k + (k+1)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+1} + ...
\frac{S}{2} = k(\frac{1}{2})^{k+1} + (k+1)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+2} + ...
Subtract the two series and you will get a GP.
Thanks a lot. Could you be a bit more specific? What is a GP? If I subtract those to series I will get S/2, but that seems to be the same basic thing, with the indexes delayed. So what do I do with it?
 
No, it won't be the same thing.
You will have
<br /> S-\frac{S}{2} = k(\frac{1}{2})^k + (k+1-k)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+1} + (k+2-k-1)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+2} + ..
Write this to n terms and let n tend to infinity.
The series you now have is a Geometric Series.
 
siddharth said:
No, it won't be the same thing.
You will have
<br /> S-\frac{S}{2} = k(\frac{1}{2})^k + (k+1-k)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+1} + (k+2-k-1)(\frac{1}{2})^{k+2} + ..
Write this to n terms and let n tend to infinity.
The series you now have is a Geometric Series.
Great! Thank you very, very much.
Simply out of interest: Could you also explain in a little more detail how I would do it with differentiating?
 
1+x+x^2+x^3+..

is the power series for (1-x)^-1

that is sufficient to solve it (ignoring convergence issues)

and if youi don't know what a GP is you're not going to get very far in doing these questions. Or was it you dfidn't knwo what the abbreviation was?
 
  • #10
matt grime said:
1+x+x^2+x^3+..
is the power series for (1-x)^-1
that is sufficient to solve it (ignoring convergence issues)
and if youi don't know what a GP is you're not going to get very far in doing these questions. Or was it you dfidn't knwo what the abbreviation was?
Thanks a lot
Well, it was that I simply don't know the abbreviation! Would you mind revealing this secret to an outsider?:smile:
Best regards...Cliowa
 
  • #11
An elementary approach.

Let's write the addendums of the serie one by one
k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k
(k+1) \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+1)}
(k+2) \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+2)}
(k+3) \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+3)}
(k+4) \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+4)}
(k+5) \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+5)}
and so on...
let's rewrite them in this "diagonal form" (notice that each row is the same of value of the rows wrote before)
k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k
k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+1)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+1)}
k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+2)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+2)} + <br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+2)}
k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+3)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+3)} + <br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+3)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+3)}
k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+4)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+4)} + <br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+4)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+4)} +<br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+4)}
k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+5)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+5)} + <br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+5)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+5)} +<br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+5)} + \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+5)}
and so on...
Now let's do the sum by columns! OK?
(In this moment there is a question that I will take back later)
What do we get when we do the sum by columns? (see next post!)
 
  • #12
We get this value from first column

k \sum_{i=k}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^i

this value from the second column

\sum_{i=k+1}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^i

this value from the third column

\sum_{i=k+2}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^i

this value from the fourth column

\sum_{i=k+3}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^i

this value from the fifth column

\sum_{i=k+4}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^i

and so on...

Notice that we from the (n+1)-th column you have exactly that value

\sum_{i=k+n}^\infty \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^i

Now using the known formula (if you don't know just ask and I'll make it clear to you!)

\sum_{i=m}^{\infty}\left( \frac{1}{2}\right)^m = 2 \left(\frac{1}{2} \right)^m

we get that the value of the sum along the first column IS

2 k \left(\frac{1}{2} \right)^{k}

from second column we get the value

2 \left(\frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+1)}

from the third

2 \left(\frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+2)}

in short for the (n+1)-th column (for n &gt;1) we get

2 \left(\frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+n)}

we are CLOSE to conclusion (in next post)
 
  • #13
Summing the values we obtained from 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th...and so on.. columns we have to do this infinite sum

k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k + <br /> 2 \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+1)} + <br /> 2 \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+2)} + <br /> 2 \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+3)} + <br /> 2 \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+4)} +<br /> \cdots <br /> 2 \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{(k+n)} +<br /> \cdots =

=<br /> k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k +<br /> 2 \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k <br /> \left[<br /> \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^i<br /> \right] =<br />

=<br /> k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k +<br /> 2 \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k <br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) =<br /> k \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k +<br /> \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k =<br />
=<br /> (k+1) \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^k <br />


And that's it!

(I hope I haven't made some error but the method works!)


And now remember the notice I told I would take back later? Now it the moment.
To calculate the sum we decided to sum the addenda in a different way.
YOU can do such a passage ONLY if you know A PRIORI that the serie converges!
Commutativity for infinite (denumerable) elements works only on convergent series!
(By the way it is easy to see that this serie converges!)

It is just for Math's sake I wanted to specify this to you!

Hope you liked my effort to find the sum without derivating some serie term by term!
:)
 
  • #14
You could also take the result for the geometric series, insert a parameter in the exponent, and then differentiate by that parameter to achieve the result. (alpha smaller than 1 for convergence (1/2 here))
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \alpha^n = \frac{1}{1-\alpha}

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \alpha^{t n} = \frac{1}{1-\alpha^t}

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{d}{dt}\alpha^{t n} = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{1}{1-\alpha^t}

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} n \alpha^{n} = \frac{\alpha}{(1-\alpha)^2}

For the sum starting at k instead of 0, do the same thing for the geometric series from 0 to k-1, then subtract.

Edit: oh, looks like matt already said this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K