Information traveling faster than light

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of information transmission and its limitations, specifically addressing the notion that nothing, including information, can travel faster than the speed of light. The thought experiments involving gears and a long pole illustrate the misconception that instantaneous movement could convey information faster than light. Key points include the speed of sound in materials like steel, which is approximately 6000 m/s, and the fact that non-rigidity in materials affects the perceived speed of transmission. The discussion references physics principles and common misconceptions surrounding rigid bodies and signal transmission.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly related to speed and motion.
  • Familiarity with the concept of the speed of light (c) and its implications in physics.
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically the speed of sound in solids like steel.
  • Awareness of quantum entanglement and its distinction from classical information transmission.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum entanglement on information transfer.
  • Explore the physics of rigid body dynamics and the limitations of material rigidity.
  • Learn about the speed of sound in various materials and its relevance to signal transmission.
  • Investigate the concept of relativity and its effects on information transfer at high speeds.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, engineering students, and anyone interested in the principles of motion and information transmission in physical systems.

MiLara
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I know there is a modern paradigm that states that nothing, including information, can travel faster than the speed of light. (With exception to quantum entanglement, but I'm not going to pretend like I know the exact details of that subject).

Thought experiment.

Imagine there are a series of gears in a row that span a much greater length than 3*10^8 meters. Now let's say you turn the gear at the beginning and it sets off a reaction to the other gears down line from the beginning. Could the last gear turn "instantaneously" or much under 1 second after the first gear is turned? Would this then be considered information being conveyed at faster than the speed of light? What are the limitations of such a device, and how much would friction or any other factors play a roll in the time delay from the first gear turning to the last.

Now let's imagine a really long pole that is much longer that 3*10^8 meters. If you were to all of a sudden push that pole perfectly straight forward from one end, it seems like the other end would move at that exact moment because it is a rigid body. Would this be considered sending information faster than the speed of light, or even sending information instantaneously?

Now, I'm sure I'm not clever enough to have created such an simple device that seems to defy the laws of physics, and to that end, I'd love for someone to tell me what I am missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actions taken at one end of your gears or the pole travel at the speed of sound through the material, which is much slower than c.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus and MiLara
MiLara said:
Now let's imagine a really long pole that is much longer that 3*10^8 meters. If you were to all of a sudden push that pole perfectly straight forward from one end, it seems like the other end would move at that exact moment because it is a rigid body. Would this be considered sending information faster than the speed of light, or even sending information instantaneously?
This is a pretty commonly asked question. Here is a good reference that discusses it

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/can-i-send-a-signal-faster-than-light-by-pushing-a-rigid-rod/

The gears proposal would also be limited in the same way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MiLara and Drakkith
MiLara said:
Thank you! That was very helpful. Now I wonder how long an object would have to be in order for the time delay to be noticed by human eyes.
Hmm, good question. Since movies play at like 22 or so frames per second, I would say that you could probably detect something at 100 ms for sure. The speed of sound in steel is about 6000 m/s, so you should be able to see it in a 600 m length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus and stoomart
MiLara said:
Now I wonder how long an object would have to be in order for the time delay to be noticed by human eyes.
The speed of sound in solid steel is somewhere around 6 kilometers/second, and the human eye can distinguish events separated by maybe a tenth of a second... So you might think that under ideal conditions an alert person might just barely be able to perceive the time lag between pushing one end of a 600 meter steel rod and the other end moving.

There's no relativity involved here, this is just about steel not being perfectly rigid. On the one hand, six km/sec is about one five-thousandth the speed of light, far too small for any relativistic effects to appear. On the other hand, the non-rigidity of a 600 meter steel rod is going to be very apparent; it will behave more like a steel cable, all stretchy and flexible, than a rigid bar.

[edit: Dale beat me to it!]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus, Dale and stoomart
Nugatory said:
the non-rigidity of a 600 meter steel rod is going to be very apparent; it will behave more like a steel cable, all stretchy and flexible, than a rigid bar.

Like these, for example...
rails.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stephanus

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K