A Infrared spectrophotometer DIY

AI Thread Summary
Building a DIY infrared spectrophotometer for organic compound analysis is feasible but presents challenges, particularly in signal reception and monochromator design. The optimal wavelength range for analysis is between 2.5 µm and 25 µm, with suggestions to explore thermocouples, thermopiles, or pyroelectric detectors for sensing. A simpler FTIR design with fewer moving parts is recommended, and using a high-resolution bar scanner can enhance detection capabilities. However, creating a comprehensive database for spectrum peak identification remains a significant hurdle, as commercial options are costly. Overall, while DIY spectrophotometry is possible, it requires careful consideration of components and data management.
Ludek
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone gathered here, I am passionate about chemistry and practical physics but the analysis of organic compounds is beyond my wallet and myself. So I want to build a spectrometer for functional group analysis and compound fingerprinting. The most commonly used range was from 2,5um to 24-25um (Wavenumber 4000 to 400 cm–1) And now the biggest problem will be receiving the signal and splitting the signal to be as monochromatic as possible.That's why I would like to ask how and what to make/buy monochrator. And what sensor would be best, thermocouple or something else
 
Science news on Phys.org
Back in the day when I worked on CO2 lasers (@ 10um), thermopiles, thermistors, etc. were the only practical sensor. IDK, maybe there's something more exotic than just measuring heat now, but it won't be a normal semiconductor junction, especially at 25um.

Check out pyroelectric detectors too. IIRC, they weren't great for average power. OTOH we were at 100's of watts, so YMMV. 25um is still a problem, I think.

Ask Google about deep IR detectors, they'll know more than us, I think.
 
Last edited:
While it may not work for far infrared a "bar scanner", 1 pixel wide, are DIY. By beam spreading lens and/or mirrors, or just increased distance from the diffraction grating to the bar scanner (reduced intensity) will increase the resolution. It should do near IR okay, and maybe get into the mid IR, depending on brand of bar scanner. Get 2000 dpi bar scanner. Or more, not a 300 dpi or even a 600. Used is cheaper for your first model. Find instructions on several websites/pages. I did. Get a 1 foot bar scanner, not a 1 inch. A discarded page scanner can be disassembled for it's bar scanner. The instructions to make an Arduino to read the bar scanner is online as well.

I think your greatest problem will be creating the database. There are some free ones but they are incomplete. The commercial spectrum peak identification databases are expensive, when I priced them 5 years ago, at over 2,000 USD. At that price, might as well buy the device that comes with the software and database.
 
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
Back
Top