Initial Value Equations from ADM Formalism - Trying again

In summary: I am going to carry on with this, even though nobody is joining in, because it is helping me to see that my problem is only a computational one - rather than something to do with the fundamental principles of the theory.In this post, I am going to look at the next wanted term, which is ##2N^i \Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{km}##So I start with ##\delta(2N^i \Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{km})##= ##\delta(N^i \Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{km} + N^k \Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{im})##= ##N^i\Gamma ^j
  • #1
TerryW
Gold Member
191
13
Homework Statement
I'm having another attempt to get a bit of help working out how MTW (21.115) (attached) can be derived from:

##I = \frac{1}{16π}\int[ \dot π^{ij} γ_{ij} - N\mathcal{H} -N_i\mathcal{H^i}]d^4x + \int\mathfrak{L}_{Field}d^4x \quad## MTW (21.95)
Relevant Equations
In the hope of making progress, I'm going to present my working so far bit by bit to see if anyone can spot where I am going wrong. I'll start with a bit that seems to work OK:

I am first going to vary ## - N\mathcal{H} ## wrt ##g_{ij}##
##\delta(- N\mathcal{H}) = \delta(-N[\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}(Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Trπ )^2 -\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R])##

and I am going to concentrate on the first part and find ##\delta(-N[\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}(Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Trπ )^2]) ## wrt ##g_{ij}##.

##\delta(-N[\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}(Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2]) = \delta(-N^2[(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}]^{-1}(Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2) ##

## = -N^2(-1)[(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}]^{-2} \frac{1}{2}(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij} (Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2)\delta g_{ij} -N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}\delta(Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2)##

## = \frac{1}{2}N^2(-g)^{-\frac{1}{2}} g^{ij} (Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2)\delta g_{ij} -N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}\delta(Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2)##

## = \frac{1}{2}N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}} g^{ij} (Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2)\delta g_{ij} -N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}(\delta(g_{js}π^{sm}g_{mi}π^{ij}) - \frac{1}{2} 2(Trπ)π^{ij}\delta g_{ij}##

## = \frac{1}{2}N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}} g^{ij} (Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2)\delta g_{ij} -N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}(π^{im}g_{ms}π^{sj} +g_{ms}π^{sj} π^{im}- (Trπ)π^{ij})\delta g_{ij}#### = [\frac{1}{2}N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}} g^{ij} (Trπ ^2 - \frac{1}{2}(Tr π )^2) -2N\gamma^{-\frac{1}{2}}(π^{im}π_m{}^j +g_{ms}π^{sj} π^{im}- \frac{1}{2}(Trπ)π^{ij})]\delta g_{ij}##

This has produced two of the terms in MTW's (21.115) which makes me feel that my process for finding the variation wrt ##g_{ij}## is probably sound.

Can anyone suggest where I might be missing something?RegardsTerry W
244263
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
My original post had quite a few looks but didn't get any replies. I am going to reply to myself and continue to set out my workings in the hope that someone else will join the conversation and help me resolve my problem.

In the last part, I managed to produce two of the terms in (21.115). This next part produces another bit of (21.115) but this time there is a discrepancy:

I am now going to look at the second part of N##\mathcal{H} ( = N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R)## to find the variation wrt ##g_{ij}##

So ##\delta(N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R) = \delta((-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}R)##

= ##\delta((-g)^{\frac{1}{2}})R + (-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\delta R)##

= ##\frac{1}{2}(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}\delta g_{ij} R + (-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\delta (g_{ij}R^{ij})##

= ##(\frac{1}{2}N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}R + N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R^{ij})\delta g_{ij}##

= ##-[N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}(R^{ij} -\frac{1}{2}g^{ij}R)]\delta g_{ij} + 2N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R^{ij}\delta g_{ij}##I now have another element of (21.115) with ##-[N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}(R^{ij} -\frac{1}{2}g^{ij}R)]## but to achieve this, I have had to add in an extra term ##2N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R^{ij}##.

There are four more terms to vary and I have found that surplus elements in one variation cancel surplus elements in another, but nowhere along the line can I find anything to cancel ##2N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R^{ij}##.

Is there anyone out there able to join in this conversation?RegardsTerry W
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Besides asking Kip Thorne or the other authors I don't have any other helpful advice.
Let us know how did you solve it in the end.
 
  • #4
Hi Mathematical Physicist,

I might try this at a later date when I have completed the presentation of my workings. I wonder if I am doing this all wrong but you haven't suggested that this is the case, so I'll carry on with the next bit, which is to find the variation of ##2N_i \pi^{ik}{}_{|k}##

So ##\delta(2N_i \pi^{ik}{}_{|k}) = \delta(2g_{ij}N^j \pi^{ik}{}_{|k})##

= ##\delta (g_{ij}N^j\pi^{ik}{}_{|k} + g_{ij}N^i\pi^{jk}{}_{|k})##

= ##\delta(g_{ij}(N^j\pi^{ik})_{|k} =g_{ij}(N^i\pi^{jk})_{|k} -g_{ij}N^j{}_{|k}\pi^{ik}-g_{ij}N^i{}_{|k}\pi^{jk})##

= ##(-N^j{}_{|k}\pi^{ik} -N^i{}_{|k}\pi^{jk})\delta g_{ij} = 2(N^i\pi ^{jk})_{|k}\delta g_{ij}##

This gives me another element of ( with 21.115) with ##(-N^j{}_{|k}\pi^{ik} -N^i{}_{|k}\pi^{jk})## but I have an unwanted term ##2(N^i\pi ^{jk})_{|k}##

In this case, the unwanted term turns out not to be a problem because it is canceled out by a term which arises in the next chapter - which will appear when I get back from holiday!

TerryW
 
  • #5
Well I am no expert in GR, I haven't even finished reading Schutz's and the Solution manual I have for it.
Maybe I'll get back to it who knows when.
 
  • #6
For the next variation, I have to start working on the divergence part (so we can't just ignore it??) and take first of all:

##\delta[(-2\pi^{ij}N_j)_{,i}]##

= ##\delta[(-2\pi^{kj}N_j)_{,k}]##

= ##\delta[(-2\pi^{kj}g_{ij}N^i)_{,k}]##

=##\delta[-g_{ij}(2\pi^{kj}N^i)_{,k} - 2\pi^{kj}N^i g_{ij, k}]##

=## -2(\pi^{kj}N^i)_{,k}\delta g_{ij}##

=## -2(\pi^{kj})_{,k}N^i +\pi^{kj})N^i {}_{,k})\delta g_{ij}##

= ##[-2(\pi^{kj})_{|k}N^i +\pi^{kj})N^i {}_{|k}) +2(N^i(\Gamma ^k{}_{mk}\pi^{mj}+\Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{km}-\Gamma ^m{}_{mk}\pi^{kj}) +\pi^{kj}\Gamma^{i}{}_{mk}N^m)]\delta g_{ij}##

##= [-2(\pi^{kj}N^i)_{|k}) +2(N^i\Gamma ^k{}_{mk}\pi^{mj}+N^i \Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{km}-N^i\Gamma ^m{}_{mk}\pi^{kj} +N^m \pi^{kj}\Gamma^{i}{}_{mk})]\delta g_{ij}##

= ##= [-2(\pi^{kj}N^i)_{|k}) +2(N^i \Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{km} +N^m \pi^{kj}\Gamma^{i}{}_{mk})]\delta g_{ij}##
(Because ##N^i\Gamma ^k{}_{mk}\pi^{mj} = N^i\Gamma ^m{}_{mk}\pi^{kj}##)

My first term ##(-2(\pi^{kj}N^i)_{|k})## cancels the unwanted term from my last post, but now I am left with two more unwanted terms: ##2N^i \Gamma ^j{}_{mk}\pi^{km} +2N^m \pi^{kj}\Gamma^{i}{}_{mk}##

In my next post, I'll get rid of one of these two terms, but gain another unwanted term.

TerryW
 
  • #7
Now I am going to look at the variation ##\delta((N^i Tr\pi)_{,i})##

##\delta((N^i Tr\pi)_{,i})## = ##\delta((N^k g_{ij} \pi^{ij})_{,k})##

## = \delta((g_{ij}(N^k \pi^{ij})_{,k} + (N^k \pi^{ij})g_{ij, k})##

##= (N^k \pi^{ij})_{,k}\delta g_{ij}##

##= (N^k{}_{|k} - \Gamma^k{}_{mk} N^m)\pi^{ij} +N^k(\pi^{ij}{}_{|k} - (\Gamma^i{}_{mk}\pi^{mj} + \Gamma^j{}_{mk}pi^{mi} - \Gamma^m{}_{mk}\pi^{ij}))\delta g_{ij}##

##= ((N^k \pi^{ij})_{|k} - N^k(\Gamma^i{}_{mk}\pi^{mj} + \Gamma^j{}_{mk}\pi^{mi}) - N^m \pi^{ij}\Gamma^k{}_{mk} + N^k \pi^{ij} \Gamma^m{}_{mk})\delta g_{ij}##

Which, with a bit of index manipulation, becomes

##= ((N^k \pi^{ij})_{|k} -2N^m \Gamma^i{}_{mk}\pi^{kj})\delta g_{ij}##

The first term is an element of (21.115) and the second term cancels one of the unwanted terms in my last post (without adding a further unwanted term as stated previously).

Now there is just one more post to go.
 
  • #8
Here is the final piece of my 'derivation', taking the variation of ##-(2N^{|i}\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}})_i##

##-\delta(-(2N^{|i}\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}})_{,i }) = \delta(-(2N^{|i}\frac{(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{N})_{,i})##

##= \delta(+2N^{|i}(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{N_{,i}}{N^2} - 2(\frac{(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{N}N^{|i})_{,i})##

Then using (21.85)

##= \delta(+2N^{|i}(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{N_{,i}}{N^2} - 2\frac{(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{N}N^{|i}{}_{|i})##

##= 2(\frac{1}{2}\frac{(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}}{N^2}g^{ij}\delta g_{ij})N^{|i}N_{|i} - 2(\frac{1}{2}(-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}\delta g_{ij})\frac{N^{|i}{}_{|i}}{N}##

##= \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}\frac{N^{|i}N_{|i}}{N} \delta g_{ij} - \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}N^{|m}{}_{|m}\delta g_{ij}##

##= \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{N^{|i}N^{|j}}{N} \delta g_{ij} - \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}N^{|m}{}_{|m}\delta g_{ij}##

##\Big[ \Big( \frac{N^{|i}}{N} \Big) ^{|j} = \frac{N^{|ij}}{N} - \frac{N^{|i}N^{|j}}{N^2} \Rightarrow \frac{N^{|i}N^{|j}}{N^2} = -N \Big( \frac{N^{|i}}{N} \Big) ^{|j} +N^{|ij} \Big]##

Leading to

##\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{N^{|i}N^{|j}}{N} \delta g_{ij} - \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}N^{|m}{}_{|m}\delta g_{ij} = \Big(- \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}g^{ij}N^{|m}{}_{|m} + \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}N^{|ij} - \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}N\Big( \frac{N^{|i}}{N} \Big) ^{|j}\Big)\delta g_{ij}##

To summarise:

I have now derived all the elements of 21.115 but I have three unwanted extras which are:

## 2N\gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}R^{ij} + 2\Gamma^j{}_{mk}\pi^{mj}N^i - \gamma^{\frac{1}{2}}N\Big( \frac{N^{|i}}{N} \Big) ^{|j}##

I can't see any prospect of these terms cancelling each other out and I don't think they qualify for the description of "source terms arising from fields other than geometry"

So unless someone can wade in and show me where I've gone wrong, I am stuck!Terry W
 

1. What is the ADM formalism?

The ADM formalism, also known as the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner formalism, is a mathematical framework used in general relativity to describe spacetime as a four-dimensional manifold. It was developed by Richard Arnowitt, Stanley Deser, and Charles Misner in the 1950s.

2. How are initial value equations derived from the ADM formalism?

The initial value equations are derived from the ADM formalism by using the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity. This involves splitting spacetime into space and time, and solving for the initial values of the metric and extrinsic curvature tensors on a spatial hypersurface.

3. What is the significance of initial value equations in general relativity?

The initial value equations are important in general relativity because they provide a way to determine the evolution of spacetime from a given set of initial conditions. This is necessary in order to solve the Einstein field equations and make predictions about the behavior of spacetime.

4. Can the ADM formalism and initial value equations be applied to other theories of gravity?

Yes, the ADM formalism and initial value equations can be applied to other theories of gravity, such as scalar-tensor theories and modified theories of gravity. However, the specific equations may differ depending on the theory being studied.

5. Are there any challenges or limitations to using the ADM formalism and initial value equations?

One challenge of using the ADM formalism and initial value equations is that they only apply to vacuum solutions of the Einstein field equations, meaning that there are no sources of matter or energy present. Another limitation is that they are difficult to apply in situations with complicated spacetime geometries, such as those involving black holes or cosmological singularities.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
766
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
263
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
884
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
907
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
998
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
729
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top