In that formalism, one writes(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] g_{\alpha \beta} dx^\alpha dx^\beta = (-N^2 + N_i N^i) dt^2 + 2 N_j dt dx^j + h_{ij} dx^i dx^j [/tex]

First, a simple question: the lapse function N here is unrelated to the shift vector [itex] N_^i [/tex], right? I mean, clearly [itex] N^2 \neq N_i N^i [/tex] but is there any other relation? I am assuming no.

How are the Latin indices raised and lowered? Is it true that [itex] N_i = h_{ij} N^j [/itex] ?

Now, I have read that a conformal transformation

[tex] g_{\alpha \beta} \rightarrow \Omega^2 g_{\alpha \beta} [/tex]

corresponds to the following transformations of the laspe function and shift vectors:

[tex] N \rightarrow \Omega N, ~~~~N^i \rightarrow N^i ~~~~ h_{ij} \rightarrow \Omega^2 h_{ij} [/tex]

This would make sense if [itex] N_i = h_{ij} N^j [/itex] so that we would have [tex] N_i \rightarrow \Omega^2 N_i [/tex] but I am not sure if I am correct about this way of lowering the indices on N.

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Two questions about the ADM formalism

Loading...

Similar Threads - questions formalism | Date |
---|---|

I Some geometry questions re Swartzchild metric | Friday at 9:27 AM |

B Causality Question | Feb 23, 2018 |

I A question about the relativistic energy dispersion relation | Feb 20, 2018 |

B Another question about Gravity -- Does the apple attract the Earth? | Jan 25, 2018 |

I Tetrad formalism outside of the equatorial plane | Nov 27, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**