Initiating Research Work - Comments

  • Context: Insights 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion emphasizes the importance of pursuing original research ideas rather than solely adhering to established consensus. ZapperZ highlights a comment by Zz, which states that researchers must understand both what is interesting and what is important. However, ZapperZ argues that relying too heavily on consensus can stifle innovation. Students and researchers are encouraged to justify their unique questions and explore them, as this could lead to significant discoveries, even if the initial topic seems overlooked.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of research methodologies
  • Familiarity with academic consensus and its implications
  • Ability to critically assess the importance of research questions
  • Knowledge of how to justify and defend original research ideas
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore techniques for identifying unique research questions
  • Learn about the process of peer review and its impact on research consensus
  • Study case studies of groundbreaking research that challenged existing norms
  • Investigate methods for effectively communicating the significance of original research
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, graduate students, and academic professionals interested in developing innovative research ideas and challenging existing academic norms.

ZapperZ
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
32,812
Reaction score
4,723
ZapperZ submitted a new PF Insights post

Initiating Research Work

researchwork-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
I really cannot disagree with anything said, but I would like to comment on one part in particular.

Zz said, "(ii) you need to know not only what’s interesting, but what is important."

This is true, but it needs to be taken with a grain of salt, I think. If we pay too much attention to the consensus regarding what it important, then everyone would work on the same problem. Each researcher certainly needs to know why his work is important, but it does not always come from the fact that someone else says so. If we always waited for someone else to endorse out idea, we would never get there first. If a student sees clearly that a question is important, and can truly justify it even if it disagrees with consensus, then I think he should pursue that idea and find out. The worst that can happen is that he learns something nobody cares about, but that is hardly the end of the world. He may very well discover something that lots of people will care about when they find out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K