Injective linear mapping - image

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that a linear mapping \( f: V \rightarrow W \) is injective if and only if the image of every linearly independent subset \( S \) of \( V \) remains linearly independent in \( W \). The user establishes that if \( f \) is injective, then the kernel \( \text{kern}(f) \) is zero, leading to \( \dim(\text{im}(f)) = \dim(V) \). This implies that \( \text{im}(f) = W \). The proof hinges on the linearity of \( f \) and the properties of linear independence, ultimately requiring a contradiction if the image of \( S \) is assumed to be dependent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear mappings and vector spaces
  • Familiarity with concepts of linear independence and dependence
  • Knowledge of the rank-nullity theorem
  • Basic properties of fields in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rank-nullity theorem in detail
  • Explore properties of injective linear transformations
  • Learn about the implications of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Investigate examples of linear mappings and their images
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, vector spaces, and linear mappings. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of injective functions in the context of linear transformations.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $F$ be a field and $V,W$ finite-dimensional vector spaces over $F$.

Let $f:V\rightarrow W$ a $F$-linear mapping.

We have to show that $f$ is injective if and only if for each linearly independent subset $S$ of $V$ the Image $f(S)$ is linearly independent in $W$. I have done the following:

If $f$ is injective we have that $kern (f)=\{0\}$, right?

Since $\dim (kern(f))+\dim (im(f))=\dim V$ and since $\dim (kern (f))=0$ we get that $\dim (im(f))=\dim V$.

It holds that $\dim im(f) = \dim W$, right?

So, we get that $im (f) = W$, or not? (Wondering)

Does this help us to get the desired result? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since $S$ is linearly independent we get that $\sum_{i=1}^nc_is_i=0 \Rightarrow c_i=0, \forall i$, where $s_i\in S$.

Then since $f$ is linear we have that $f\left (\sum_{i=1}^nc_is_i\right )=f(0) \Rightarrow \sum_{i=1}^nc_if(s_i)=0$.

How do we continue from here? How do we use the fact that $f$ is injective? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Since $S$ is linearly independent we get that $\sum_{i=1}^nc_is_i=0 \Rightarrow c_i=0, \forall i$, where $s_i\in S$.

Then since $f$ is linear we have that $f\left (\sum_{i=1}^nc_is_i\right )=f(0) \Rightarrow \sum_{i=1}^nc_if(s_i)=0$.

How do we continue from here? How do we use the fact that $f$ is injective? (Wondering)

Take the image of a linearly independent set and assume it is not independent you should be able to get a contradiction using the fact you gave that injective means the kernal is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K