Inner automorphism proof question

  • Thread starter Thread starter wakko101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the automorphism P defined by P(A) = (A^T)^-1 for the group G = GL(2, R) is not an inner automorphism. The key argument involves examining the restriction of P to the center Z(G) of G, where it is shown that P(A) = A for all A in Z(G). This leads to the conclusion that there cannot exist a fixed matrix B in G such that P(A) = BAB^-1 for all A in G, as it would imply that A is equal to its own inverse transpose, which is not generally true.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically the properties of automorphisms.
  • Familiarity with the general linear group GL(2, R) and its structure.
  • Knowledge of matrix operations, including transposition and inversion.
  • Concept of the center of a group and its significance in group theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the center Z(G) in the context of GL(n) for various n.
  • Explore the implications of inner versus outer automorphisms in group theory.
  • Investigate examples of matrices in the center of GL(2, R) to solidify understanding.
  • Learn about other types of automorphisms and their applications in linear algebra.
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, particularly those studying group theory, as well as mathematicians interested in the properties of linear transformations and automorphisms.

wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let G = GL(2, R). Define P : G to G by P(A) = The inverse of the transpose of A (ie. ((A)tr)^-1). P is an automorphism of G, prove that P is not an inner automorphism of G. That is, prove that there does not exist a fixed matrix B in G such that P(A) = BAB^-1 for all A in G. (Hint: consider the restriction of P to the centre Z(G) of G)

Homework Equations


The centre of G = {A in G: AB = BA for all B in G}

The Attempt at a Solution


If we restrict A to Z(G) then we have that BAB^-1 = A for all B in G. So, P(A) = ((A)tr)^-1 = BAB^-1 = A which would imply that the transpose of A equals the inverse of A for all B in G. I'm not sure if this is what we were meant to do, since I can't see how this might help prove P is not an inner autom'sm.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Cheers,
W. =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, an inner automorphism is defined by P(A)=BAB^(-1) for a fixed B. What you actually have there is P(A)=(transpose(A))^(-1)=A for all A in Z(G). At this point it might be helpful to know what the center of GL(n) is. Or at least some examples of matrices in the center.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K