Conjugation as an Automorphism: Proof and Applications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that conjugation by an element \( g \) in a group \( G \) defines an automorphism of \( G \). The proof establishes that the mapping \( \sigma_g(x) = gxg^{-1} \) is a bijection and a homomorphism, confirming that conjugation preserves group structure. Consequently, it is deduced that elements \( x \) and \( gxg^{-1} \) share the same order, and for any subset \( A \) of \( G \), the cardinality \( |A| \) equals \( |gAg^{-1}| \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically automorphisms and homomorphisms.
  • Familiarity with the properties of bijections in mathematical proofs.
  • Knowledge of the order of elements in a group.
  • Basic comprehension of set theory, particularly regarding cardinality.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group automorphisms in more depth.
  • Learn about the implications of conjugation in various types of groups, such as finite and infinite groups.
  • Explore the relationship between injectivity and surjectivity in the context of group mappings.
  • Investigate the role of conjugacy classes in group theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, students studying group theory, and anyone interested in the structural properties of groups and their automorphisms.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Let ##G## be a group and let ##G## act on itself by left conjugation, so each ##g \in G## maps ##G## to ##G## by ##x \mapsto gxg^{-1}##. For fixed ##g \in G##, prove that conjunction by ##G## is an automomorphism of G. Deduce that ##x## and ##gxg^{-1}## have the same order for all ##x## in ##G## and that for any subset ##A## of ##G##, ##|A| = |gAg^{-1}|##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is how I approached the problem. Let ##\sigma_g = gxg^{-1}##. I will take it as given that ##\sigma_g## is a bijection from ##G## to ##G##, as I have already proved this in the general case before and don't feel like doing it again. Thus, we must only show that ##\sigma_g## is a homomorphism. Let ##x_1, x_2 \in G##. Then ##\sigma_g (x_1x_2) = g x_1 x_2 g^{-1} = g x_1 g^{-1} g x_2 g^{-1} = \sigma_g (x_1) \sigma_g(x_2)##. So ##\sigma_g## is an automorphism.

We can say that ##|x| = |gxg^{-1}|## because isomorphisms preserve order and we can say that ##|A| = |gAg^{-1}|## because ##\sigma_g## is injective and so the elements in ##A## will be mapped to distinct elements.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


Let ##G## be a group and let ##G## act on itself by left conjugation, so each ##g \in G## maps ##G## to ##G## by ##x \mapsto gxg^{-1}##. For fixed ##g \in G##, prove that conjunction by ##G## is an automomorphism of G. Deduce that ##x## and ##gxg^{-1}## have the same order for all ##x## in ##G## and that for any subset ##A## of ##G##, ##|A| = |gAg^{-1}|##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is how I approached the problem. Let ##\sigma_g = gxg^{-1}##.
##\sigma_g(x) = gxg^{-1}##
I will take it as given that ##\sigma_g## is a bijection from ##G## to ##G##, as I have already proved this in the general case before and don't feel like doing it again. Thus, we must only show that ##\sigma_g## is a homomorphism. Let ##x_1, x_2 \in G##. Then ##\sigma_g (x_1x_2) = g x_1 x_2 g^{-1} = g x_1 g^{-1} g x_2 g^{-1} = \sigma_g (x_1) \sigma_g(x_2)##. So ##\sigma_g## is an automorphism.

We can say that ##|x| = |gxg^{-1}|## because isomorphisms preserve order ...
You can also just write the same line as before again: ##(gxg^{-1})^n=gx^ng^{-1}## and one equals ##e=1## if and only if the other does, too.
... and we can say that ##|A| = |gAg^{-1}|## because ##\sigma_g## is injective and so the elements in ##A## will be mapped to distinct elements.
You also need surjectivity as ##G## might not be finite, in which case (finite case) injectivity implies surjectivity and vice versa. Otherwise ##A## could be larger.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97
Correction:
fresh_42 said:
in which case (finite case) injectivity implies surjectivity
is wrong. I confused this with vector spaces and dimensions. If we know nothing but that ##A## is a set, then even in a finite case, a proper subset is an injective embedding which is not surjective.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
993
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K