Inner Product as a Transformation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
nautolian
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let V be an inner product space. For v ∈ V fixed, show
that T(u) =< v, u > is a linear operator on V .

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First to show it is a linear operator, you show that T(u+g)=T(u)+T(g) and T(ku)=kT(u)
So,
T(u+g)=<v, u+g>=<v,u>+<v,g>=T(u)+T(g)
Then T(ku)=<v, ku>=k<v,u>
And since both the results are in the inner product space it is a linear operator on V? However, I don't know if this is right, because can't you not split up the second value like I did? Only the first? A little clarification would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nautolian said:

Homework Statement



Let V be an inner product space. For v ∈ V fixed, show
that T(u) =< v, u > is a linear operator on V .

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



First to show it is a linear operator, you show that T(u+g)=T(u)+T(g) and T(ku)=kT(u)
So,
T(u+g)=<v, u+g>=<v,u>+<v,g>=T(u)+T(g)
Then T(ku)=<v, ku>=k<v,u>
And since both the results are in the inner product space it is a linear operator on V? However, I don't know if this is right, because can't you not split up the second value like I did? Only the first? A little clarification would be appreciated! Thanks!

If your inner product is over the real numbers then both are fine. If it's over the complex numbers then you'll have to say exactly how your inner product is defined.
 
By definition the inner product is bilinear,that is,linear in eahh variable while the other variable is held constant.
 
hedipaldi said:
By definition the inner product is bilinear,that is,linear in eahh variable while the other variable is held constant.

In complex spaces this is not entirely correct. If we use the *usual* definition of inner product [tex]<u,v> \equiv \sum_{i=1}^n \bar{u}_i v_i,[/tex] where the bar denotes the complex conjugate, then
[tex]<u,cv> = c<u,v>, \text{ but } <cu,v> = \bar{c}<u,v>.[/tex]
Note: this definition of inner product gives <u,u> ≥ 0 and real; the other type
[tex](u,v) \equiv \sum_{i=1}^n u_i v_i[/tex] gives (u,u) = complex number, in general.

RGV