Instability of a Rigid Untethered Ring Around a Planet

And the sphere has no restoring force to counteract the drift. So the only way for the sphere to be stable is if the orbit of the sphere is somehow "locked" to the rotation of the star. It can't just be in any random orbit.
  • #1
PvtRyan96
I had this discussion while driving home to California from a trip to Washington state with a friend.

We were discussing the stability of a completely rigid, untethered, ring-structure around Earth, and I did not know how to explain to him that such a thing must be tethered by rigid towers lest one portion of it begin a runaway acceleration towards the planet's surface, crashing into the ground. Certainly, this is the case, right? There is no restoring force to bring the ring back to its original position when even the slightest drift occurs, and, even if the ring were to be spinning in geostationairy orbit, that does not impart any additional stability, does it? The apsis wouldn't suddenly begin rotation around the planet, so, since the perigee is closer to the surface and experiencing a stronger gravitational pull than the rest of the rigid ring, it would overall experience a net force leading to the perigee slamming right into the ground, as far as I am aware.

Anyway, if I'm correct, I'd like to have some kind of thought experiment or layman's terms explanation to convey the information I can't easily explain to him.

This is my first thread, also, so I apologize for any silent rules about this process that I am ignorant of.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

Such a "free floating" ring with central gravitational mass will indeed be unstable as can be seen from energy considerations. A fairly detailed derivation of the stability for the Niven Ring should carry over to the setup you describe (I have not read the paper in full, but I did some similar calculations on the Niven Ring years back so I concur with its conclusion about stability).
 
  • Like
Likes PvtRyan96
  • #3
A hand-waving plausibility argument is this. Let the ring lie in the x-y plane, centred on the origin. Obviously a mass located at the origin can feel no force because of the symmetry. Now displace the mass in the +y direction. Obviously there's still no net force in the x direction due to the symmetry. But what about the y direction? You can see that there's less ring further in the +y direction than there is in the -y direction. But on average, the parts of the ring on the +y side are closer to the mass than the parts on the -y side. One would expect these two effects to cancel to some degree, so it's not totally implausible that they cancel out.
 
  • #4
All of the above (and the paper Filip mentions) make perfect sense, but I notice they all ignore angular momentum. For example if part of the ring is displaced towards the planet then that part should try to speed up. Does that offer any hope of stability?
 
  • #5
CWatters said:
All of the above (and the paper Filip mentions) make perfect sense, but I notice they all ignore angular momentum. For example if part of the ring is displaced towards the planet then that part should try to speed up. Does that offer any hope of stability?

No hope there. Angular momentum will act to stabilize the ring form itself and its rotation axis (if the rotation is pure), but will not on average change anything regarding translatory stability. If the ring can be modeled as being rigid, then the rotational and translatory dynamics can be completely separated at all times around the centre of mass.
 
  • Like
Likes PvtRyan96
  • #6
Filip Larsen said:
Welcome to PF!

Such a "free floating" ring with central gravitational mass will indeed be unstable as can be seen from energy considerations. A fairly detailed derivation of the stability for the Niven Ring should carry over to the setup you describe (I have not read the paper in full, but I did some similar calculations on the Niven Ring years back so I concur with its conclusion about stability).

Ah, very interesting. I've since shown that read to the one I was having the discussion with and he seems to understand now, so thank you.

CWatters said:
All of the above (and the paper Filip mentions) make perfect sense, but I notice they all ignore angular momentum. For example if part of the ring is displaced towards the planet then that part should try to speed up. Does that offer any hope of stability?

The nature of it being a rigid ring means that no one part of the structure can move faster than another, so every part of the ring must necessarily be traveling at the same velocity around the center of the ring at all times. This is why a solid ring would fail where a collection of gas/dust would be very stable, since individual objects in free-fall are allowed to accelerate as they approach their apsides, as far as I'm aware.
 
  • #7
In 1859 James Clerk Maxwell addressed this problem in connection with the structure of Saturn's rings. He proved that such a solid ring would be unstable, and thus the rings must be made up of many separate bodies.
 
  • Like
Likes Filip Larsen, PvtRyan96 and CWatters
  • #8
Interesting. Presumably something similar applies to a Dyson Sphere?

Edit: Of course it does. There would be no net force between the sphere and the star so the sphere can just drift.
 

FAQ: Instability of a Rigid Untethered Ring Around a Planet

1. What is the cause of instability for a rigid untethered ring around a planet?

The main cause of instability for a rigid untethered ring around a planet is the gravitational forces exerted by the planet on the ring. These forces can cause the ring to tilt, wobble, or even break apart over time.

2. How does the mass and size of the planet affect the stability of the ring?

The mass and size of the planet have a significant impact on the stability of the ring. A larger and more massive planet will exert stronger gravitational forces on the ring, making it more likely to experience instability. Additionally, the distance between the planet and the ring also plays a role in the stability, with closer distances leading to stronger gravitational forces.

3. Can the tilt or wobble of the ring be corrected?

In some cases, the tilt or wobble of the ring can be corrected through external forces such as the gravitational pull of a nearby moon or satellite. However, in most cases, the instability of the ring cannot be fully corrected, and the ring will eventually break apart or form into a new, more stable shape.

4. Is there a specific range of distances from the planet where the ring is most stable?

Yes, there is a specific range of distances from the planet where the ring is most stable. This is known as the Roche limit and is determined by the mass and size of the planet. Inside the Roche limit, the gravitational forces are too strong and will cause the ring to break apart, while outside the Roche limit, the forces are too weak, and the ring will not be able to maintain its shape.

5. Can the instability of a ring around a planet have any impact on the planet itself?

In some cases, the instability of a ring around a planet can have a minimal impact on the planet itself. However, if the ring breaks apart and forms into a new shape, it can potentially impact the planet's orbit or even its atmosphere. Additionally, if the ring is composed of large debris, it can also pose a risk to any satellites or spacecraft orbiting the planet.

Similar threads

Misconceptions about expanding space
Replies
12
Views
4K
Free Fall vs accelerated reference frame question.
Replies
10
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top