I Insulator band gap and applied voltage?

gaiussheh
Messages
30
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
Will an insulator conduct if a voltage greater than the bang gap is applied?
I got confused by the band theory. Does the band gap imply the voltage needed to conduct? This seems to be ridiculous. The band gap of a typical insulator is on the order of a few eV. Hence, if you give electrons 10 eV, they jump to the conduction band. But surely you can't turn an insulator into a conductor by simply applying a 10V voltage? Otherwise, most of the common things in real life will conduct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gaiussheh said:
Does the band gap imply the voltage needed to conduct?
No, the band gap is the energy needed to excite an electron from the top of the valence band to the bottom of the conduction band. Notice that band gaps are often given in electronvolts, not volts. An electronvolt is a unit of energy, while the volt is a measure of electric potential, two very different things.

gaiussheh said:
But surely you can't turn an insulator into a conductor by simply applying a 10V voltage? Otherwise, most of the common things in real life will conduct.
Indeed. Applying a voltage does not mean that you are giving energy to electrons to excite them from the valence to the conduction band. Typically it is thermal energy that does this, and the applied voltage is what causes the electrons in the conduction band to move in an electric current. At least until you reach a high enough voltage to cause electrical breakdown of the material.
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen and Lord Jestocost
The voltage you apply cannot accelerate the electrons in the valence band, so it does not transfer energy to them. This why they are not conduction electrons.
Strong electric field may alter the band structure itself though and maybe reduce the band gap.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top