MHB Integral equation by successive approximation

AI Thread Summary
The integral equation $$y(x)=1+2\int_0^x(t+y(t))dt$$ can be simplified to $$y(x)=1+x^2+2\int_0^xy(t)dt$$. By applying the method of successive approximation, the initial approximations yield $$y_1(x)=1+2x+x^2$$, $$y_2(x)=\frac{2}{3}x^3+3x^2+2x+1$$, and $$y_3(x)=\frac{1}{3}x^4+2x^3+3x^2+x+1$$. The challenge remains in finding a general formula for $$y_n(x)$$ to derive the limit solution $$y(x)$$. The exact solution to the integral equation is provided as $$y(x) = \frac{3\ e^{2\ x} - 2\ x - 1}{2}$$, which can guide further calculations.
Suvadip
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I have to solve the integral equation $$y(x)=1+2\int_0^x(t+y(t))dt$$ by the method of successive approximation taking $$y_0(x)=1$$.

Sol: After simplification the given equation we have
$$y(x)=1+x^2+2\int_0^xy(t)dt$$. So comparing it with $$y(x)=f(x)+\lambda\int_0^x k(x,t)y(t))dt$$ we have

$$f(x)=1+x^2, \lambda=2, k(x,t)=1$$

Now let us use the relation
$$y_n(x)=f(x)+\lambda\int_0^x k(x,t)y_{n-1}(t))dt$$

Using this relation we have

$$y_1(x)=1+2x+x^2, y_2(x)=\frac{2}{3}x^3+3x^2+2x+1, y_3(x)=\frac{1}{3}x^4+2x^3+3x^2+x+1$$

Using these I am unable to find a general formula for $$y_n(x)$$ from which the required solution $$y(x)$$ can be found using $$y(x)=lim_{n \to \infty} y_n(x)$$

How should I proceed.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
suvadip said:
I have to solve the integral equation $$y(x)=1+2\int_0^x(t+y(t))dt$$ by the method of successive approximation taking $$y_0(x)=1$$.

Sol: After simplification the given equation we have
$$y(x)=1+x^2+2\int_0^xy(t)dt$$. So comparing it with $$y(x)=f(x)+\lambda\int_0^x k(x,t)y(t))dt$$ we have

$$f(x)=1+x^2, \lambda=2, k(x,t)=1$$

Now let us use the relation
$$y_n(x)=f(x)+\lambda\int_0^x k(x,t)y_{n-1}(t))dt$$

Using this relation we have

$$y_1(x)=1+2x+x^2, y_2(x)=\frac{2}{3}x^3+3x^2+2x+1, y_3(x)=\frac{1}{3}x^4+2x^3+3x^2+x+1$$

Using these I am unable to find a general formula for $$y_n(x)$$ from which the required solution $$y(x)$$ can be found using $$y(x)=lim_{n \to \infty} y_n(x)$$

How should I proceed.

Your application of the successive approximation method is correct and the result is obvious if You take into account the the 'exact' solution of the integral equation is...

$\displaystyle y(x) = \frac{3\ e^{2\ x} - 2\ x - 1}{2} = 1 + x + 3\ x^{2} + 2\ x^{3} + ... + \frac{3}{2}\ \frac{(2\ x)^{n}}{n!} + ...\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top