MHB Integral Inequality: Prove $\left|f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right|$ Bound

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here's my first challenge!

Let $f : [0,1] \to \Bbb R$ be continuously differentiable. Show that

$\displaystyle \left|f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right| \le \int_0^1 |f(t)|\, dt + \frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 |f'(t)|\, dt$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Euge said:
Here's my first challenge!

Let $f : [0,1] \to \Bbb R$ be continuously differentiable. Show that

$\displaystyle \left|f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right| \le \int_0^1 |f(t)|\, dt + \frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 |f'(t)|\, dt$.

Nice challenge! ;)

We have:
$$f(x)=\int_0^x f'(t)\,dt \le \int_0^x |f'(t)|\,dt$$
If $f(x)<0$, we have:
$$-f(x)=\int_0^x -f'(t)\,dt \le \int_0^x |f'(t)|\,dt$$
Therefore:
$$|f(x)| \le \int_0^x |f'(t)|\,dt$$
It follows that:
$$\left|f\left(\frac 12\right)\right| \le \int_0^{1/2} |f'(t)|\,dt$$
By symmetry (or substitution of $u=1-t$):
$$\left|f\left(\frac 12\right)\right| \le \int_{1/2}^1 |f'(t)|\,dt$$
Adding them up and dividing by 2 tells us that:
$$\left|f\left(\frac 12\right)\right| \le \frac 12\int_0^1 |f'(t)|\,dt$$
And since $\int_0^1 |f(t)|\,dt \ge 0$, the requested result follows.
 
I'm glad you liked the challenge, ILS! You have a very good attempt, but you started out with an error in the first line. If you take $f(x) = 1$, then

$\displaystyle \int_0^{1/2}f'(t)\, dt = 0 \neq 1 = f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)$.
 
Euge said:
Here's my first challenge!

Let $f : [0,1] \to \Bbb R$ be continuously differentiable. Show that

$\displaystyle \left|f\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right| \le \int_0^1 |f(t)|\, dt + \frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 |f'(t)|\, dt$.
[sp]Replacing $f$ by $-f$ if necessary, we may assume that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) \geqslant0.$

Suppost that the minimum value of $f$ in the interval $\bigl[0,\frac12\bigr]$ occurs at $a$, and the minimum value of $f$ in the interval $\bigl[\frac12,1\bigr]$ occurs at $b$. Then $\frac12\bigl(f(a) + f(b)\bigr)$ is the lower Riemann sum for $$\int_0^1f(t)\,dt$$ corresponding to the dissection $\{0,\frac12,1\}$, so that $$\tfrac12\bigl(f(a) + f(b)\bigr) \leqslant \int_0^1f(t)\,dt.$$

Next, $$\int_{1/ 2}^bf'(t)\,dt - \int_a^{1/ 2}f'(t)\,dt = f(b) - f\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr) - f\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr) + f(a).$$ It follows that $$\begin{aligned} f\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr) &= \tfrac12\!\bigl(f(a) + f(b)\bigr) + \tfrac12\!\!\int_a^{1/ 2}f'(t)\,dt - \tfrac12\!\!\int_{1/ 2}^bf'(t)\,dt \\ &\leqslant \int_0^1f(t)\,dt + \tfrac12\!\!\int_a^b|f'(t)|\,dt \\ &\leqslant \int_0^1|f(t)|\,dt + \tfrac12\!\!\int_0^1|f'(t)|\,dt. \end{aligned}$$[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Replacing $f$ by $-f$ if necessary, we may assume that $f\bigl(\frac12\bigr) \geqslant0.$

Suppost that the minimum value of $f$ in the interval $\bigl[0,\frac12\bigr]$ occurs at $a$, and the minimum value of $f$ in the interval $\bigl[\frac12,1\bigr]$ occurs at $b$. Then $\frac12\bigl(f(a) + f(b)\bigr)$ is the lower Riemann sum for $$\int_0^1f(t)\,dt$$ corresponding to the dissection $\{0,\frac12,1\}$, so that $$\tfrac12\bigl(f(a) + f(b)\bigr) \leqslant \int_0^1f(t)\,dt.$$

Next, $$\int_{1/ 2}^bf'(t)\,dt - \int_a^{1/ 2}f'(t)\,dt = f(b) - f\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr) - f\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr) + f(a).$$ It follows that $$\begin{aligned} f\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr) &= \tfrac12\!\bigl(f(a) + f(b)\bigr) + \tfrac12\!\!\int_a^{1/ 2}f'(t)\,dt - \tfrac12\!\!\int_{1/ 2}^bf'(t)\,dt \\ &\leqslant \int_0^1f(t)\,dt + \tfrac12\!\!\int_a^b|f'(t)|\,dt \\ &\leqslant \int_0^1|f(t)|\,dt + \tfrac12\!\!\int_0^1|f'(t)|\,dt. \end{aligned}$$[/sp]

This is an excellent solution. Thanks Opalg for participating!
 
I will show two of my solutions, both leading to the same equation that implies the result.

Solution 1.
By integration by parts,

$\displaystyle \int_0^1 f(t)\, dt = \int_0^{1/2} f(t)\, dt + \int_{1/2}^1 f(t)\, dt = \left(\frac{f\bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)}{2} - \int_0^{1/2} tf'(t)\, dt\right) + \left(\frac{f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr)}{2} + \int_{1/2}^1 (1 - t)f'(t)\, dt\right) = f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr) - \int_0^{1/2} tf'(t)\, dt + \int_{1/2}^1 (1 - t)f'(t)\, dt.$

So,

$\displaystyle f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr) = \int_0^1 f(t)\, dt + \int_0^{1/2} tf'(t)\, dt - \int_{1/2}^1 (1 - t)f'(t)\, dt$,

and thus

$\displaystyle |f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr)| \le \int_0^1 |f(t)|\, dt + \frac{1}{2}\int_0^{1/2} |f'(t)|\, dt + \frac1{2}\int_{1/2}^1 |f'(t)|\, dt = \int_0^1 |f'(t)|\, dt + \frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 |f'(t)|\, dt.$

Solution 2.
For all $x \ge \tfrac1{2}$,

$\displaystyle f(x) = f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr) + \int_{1/2}^x f'(t)\, dt$.

Therefore

$\displaystyle \int_{1/2}^1 f(t)\, dt = \frac{f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr)}{2} + \int_{1/2}^1 \int_{1/2}^x f'(t)\, dt\, dx = \frac{f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr)}{2} + \int_{1/2}^1 \int_t^1 f'(t)\, dx\, dt$
$\displaystyle = \frac{f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr)}{2} + \int_{1/2}^1 (1 - t)f'(t)\, dt.$

Now we can write

$\displaystyle \frac{f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr)}{2} = \int_{1/2}^1 f(t)\, dt - \int_{1/2}^1 (1 - t)f'(t)\, dt.$

By a symmetric argument,

$\displaystyle \frac{f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr)}{2} = \int_0^{1/2} f(t)\, dt + \int_0^1 tf'(t)\, dt$.

Adding the latter two equations,

$\displaystyle f\bigl(\tfrac1{2}\bigr) = \int_0^1 f(t)\, dt + \int_0^{1/2} tf'(t)\, dt - \int_{1/2}^1 (1 - t)f'(t)\, dt.$

This leads to the result in exactly the same way as Solution 1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top