Integral involving normal pdf and cdf

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of an integral involving the standard normal probability density function (pdf) and cumulative distribution function (cdf). Participants explore the integral of the form S φ(ax+b) Φ(x) dx, specifically from zero to infinity, while also referencing a related integral from negative to positive infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in the integral S φ(ax+b) Φ(x) dx from zero to infinity.
  • Another participant references a result from Gupta and Pillai stating that the integral S φ(ax+b) Φ(x) dx from negative to positive infinity equals Φ(b/sqrt(1+a^2)), though they are unclear on the derivation.
  • A later reply provides an explicit form of the integral and suggests exploring the double integral.
  • Another participant discusses the exponent of the integrand and proposes that it can be transformed into a different form for integration.
  • One participant questions the validity of the earlier claims regarding the integration limits and the resulting expression, suggesting a misunderstanding of the terms involved.
  • Another participant admits to a misunderstanding regarding the notation of the pdf and cdf.
  • One participant proposes a method of solving the integral by differentiating the integrand with respect to b and then re-integrating.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the integral and the relationship between the terms involved. There is no consensus on the derivation of the integral from negative to positive infinity or its connection to the proposed result.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the integration limits and the roles of the pdf and cdf in the expressions. There are unresolved aspects concerning the transformation of the integrand and the implications of the results referenced.

MikeGT
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Suppose φ(x) and Φ(x) denote the familiar standard normal pdf and cdf. I am interested in an expression for the integral:

S φ(ax+b) Φ(x) dx, from ZERO to INFINITY.

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I forgot to mention something potentially interesting. The integral

S φ(ax+b) Φ(x) dx, from -INFINITY to INFINITY

has been obtained by Gupta and Pillai in a technical report of the 60's as equal to

Φ( b/sqrt(1+a^2) ).

They mention this in a lemma but I cannot see how it was obtained. I checked it numerically and it is true.

Can that be useful?

Best

M
 
Written explicitly, your expression is

[tex]\int_0^\infty dx~\frac{e^{-(ax+b)^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\left[\int_{-\infty}^x dt~\frac{e^{-t^2/2}}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\right][/tex]

Have you tried playing around with the double integral?
 
The exponent of the integrand is -[x2 + (ax+b)2)]/2. This can then be converted into a form -(cx+d)2 + f, where c,d,f are constants depending on a and b. The integration should give you the described result.
 
I don't see how they did it when x runs from -INF to +INF. You say the exponent is not -(ax+b)^2 but it is: -[x^2+(ax+b)^2]. Apparently you're taking the extra x^2 term from the dt - integral. But how the combination can produce Φ when they integrate from -inf to +inf? They should get some constant or 1 but not Φ. To get b/sqrt(1+a^2) they do need what you describe above and an integral from 0 to +inf. Am I missing something?



Many thanks for the replies

M
 
Sorry. I misread your original question. I confused the capital and lower case phi's.
 
You can solve this by differentiating the integrand with respect to b, then re-integrating.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K