Integral total and partial of a function?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of a "total integral" of a function, drawing an analogy to total differentials. The original poster attempts to derive a formula for integrating a function of multiple variables, suggesting that integrals could be expressed similarly to differentials. However, participants point out that dividing by differentials is not mathematically valid and that the manipulation of these symbols lacks rigor. There is also a clarification that differentiation and integration are not direct inverses, which may explain why the proposed analogy does not hold. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and limitations of extending differential concepts to integrals.
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Like we have the total differential of a function:
imagem.png


I was thinking, why not take the "total integral" of a function too? Thus I did some algebraic juggling and, how I haven't aptitude for be a Ph.D. in math, I bring my ideia for the experients from here evaluate... Anyway, the ideia is the follows:

Let y = f(x), so: \int y dx = \int f dx \int y \frac{dx}{dx} = \int f \frac{1}{dx}dx \int y = \int f \frac{1}{dx}dx \;\;\;\Rightarrow \;\;\; \int y du = \int f \frac{du}{dx}dx Generalizing...

Let w = f(x,y,z), so: \int w = \int f \frac{1}{dx}dx + \int f \frac{1}{dy}dy + \int f \frac{1}{dz}dz

I don't venture take the 2nd integral of y because I think that will arise one d²x in the denominator...

What you think about? All this make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jhenrique said:
Like we have the total differential of a function:
imagem.png
Presumably dx2 means dx * dx, but what does d2x mean?
Jhenrique said:
I was thinking, why not take the "total integral" of a function too? Thus I did some algebraic juggling and, how I haven't aptitude for be a Ph.D. in math, I bring my ideia for the experients from here evaluate... Anyway, the ideia is the follows:

Let y = f(x), so: \int y dx = \int f dx \int y \frac{dx}{dx} = \int f \frac{1}{dx}dx \int y = \int f \frac{1}{dx}dx \;\;\;\Rightarrow \;\;\; \int y du = \int f \frac{du}{dx}dx Generalizing...
The steps in the middle make no sense to me. Dividing by dx is not a valid step. You started with f as a function of x. Is it somehow transformed to become a function of u later on?
Jhenrique said:
Let w = f(x,y,z), so: \int w = \int f \frac{1}{dx}dx + \int f \frac{1}{dy}dy + \int f \frac{1}{dz}dz

I don't venture take the 2nd integral of y because I think that will arise one d²x in the denominator...

What you think about? All this make sense?
 
Mark44 said:
Presumably dx2 means dx * dx, but what does d2x mean?The steps in the middle make no sense to me.

Yeah, dx²=dxdx

d²x is the 2nd differential of x wrt nothing. Wrt to something it's become: \frac{d^2y}{du^2}=\frac{d^2f}{dx^2}\left ( \frac{dx}{du} \right )^2+\frac{df}{dx}\frac{d^2x}{du^2}

Dividing by dx is not a valid step.
humm...

You started with f as a function of x. Is it somehow transformed to become a function of u later on?
The first three equations was a attempt for show what would an integral of f (like an differential of f) and the implication shows the utility of the integral of f as an chain rule.

If you get the last equation, ∫w, and multiply the equation by an arbitrary differential du, you'll have an chain rule of integrals in tree-dimensions:
\int w du= \int f \frac{du}{dx}dx + \int f \frac{du}{dy}dy + \int f \frac{du}{dz}dz
 
So d2x would be d(dx). AFAIK, this doesn't mean anything. At least it's not anything I've ever seen. Also, as I mentioned earlier, you can't divide by dx, and you can't divide by d2x. The "fractions" dy/dx and d2y/dx2 are more notation than fractions that you can manipulate.

Instead of merely manipulating symbols, as you seem to like to do, make up a function w = f(x, y, z), and see if your formula for ##\int wdu## has any relation to reality.
 
hummm... so, tell me you, why no exist total and partial integral like in differentiation, that has partial and total differential. Why my analogy no make sense?
 
Jhenrique said:
hummm... so, tell me you, why no exist total and partial integral like in differentiation, that has partial and total differential. Why my analogy no make sense?
Just off the top of my head, possibly it's because differentiation and integration aren't exactly inverse operations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K