Integrating scaled and translated indicator function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral \( I_{jk}(a) = \int_0^a \chi_{[0,1)}(2^jx-k)\,dx \), where \( \chi_{[0,1)}(x) \) is the indicator function on the interval \([0,1)\). The user proposes rewriting the indicator function as \( \chi_{[2^{-j}k,2^{-j}(k+1))}(x) \) to simplify the integral evaluation. The integral is analyzed under three cases based on the relationship between \( a \) and the bounds \( 2^{-j}k \) and \( 2^{-j}(k+1) \), leading to definitive results for each case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of indicator functions, specifically \( \chi_{[0,1)}(x) \)
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and definite integrals
  • Knowledge of piecewise functions and their evaluation
  • Basic understanding of scaling and translation in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of indicator functions and their applications in integrals
  • Learn about piecewise integration techniques in calculus
  • Explore the implications of scaling transformations on functions
  • Investigate advanced integral evaluation methods for complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integral evaluation techniques, particularly those involving indicator functions and piecewise analysis.

Wuberdall
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I am struggling to evaluate the following, relatively easy, integral (it might be because its early on a monday morning):
$$I_{jk}(a)=\int_0^a\chi_{[0,1)}(2^jx-k)\,dx,$$
where ##\chi_{[0,1)}(x)## denotes the indicator function on ##[0,1)## and ##j,k## are both integers.
My idea is to rewrite the indicator function as
$$ \chi_{[0,1)}(2^jx-k) = \chi_{[2^{-j}k,2^{-j}(k+1))}(x). $$
Thus,
$$ I_{jk}(a) = \int_0^a \chi_{[2^{-j}k,2^{-j}(k+1))}(x)\,dx. $$
And this is here I am stuck. I will welcome any ideas or advice with open arms.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your integral then has 3 cases: 2^{-j}k > a,\ 2^{-j}k \le a<2^{-j}(k+1), \ and\ 2^{-j}(k+1) \le a. In each case, the integral is simply the length of the allowed interval. Note that the first case integral = 0, while 2^{-j}k is the lower limit for the other 2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K