Integrating square to triangle?

Click For Summary
To integrate a square wave using an op-amp, the standard formula V_{out} = -\frac{1}{RC}\int V_{in} dt must be applied correctly. The issue arises because integrating over one full cycle results in zero due to the symmetry of the square wave. Instead, the integration should be performed over a variable time t to obtain a function of t, which will yield a triangle wave output. To determine the appropriate resistor and capacitor values for a desired output amplitude of 5V and frequency of 200Hz, any ratio of R and C can be chosen as long as their product meets the necessary criteria. Ultimately, selecting arbitrary values for R and C that satisfy the equation will solve the problem.
Exulus
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I need a bit of help with this. I've got an op-amp and the standard formula:

V_{out} = -\frac{1}{RC}\int V_{in} dt

And i need to integrate a square wave from it in order to determine some capacitor/resistor values to get an output amplitude of 5V and freq 200Hz (triangle wave). Every time i try to do it i end up getting 0 as an answer (which is kind of logical, considering one half of the cycle is the negative of the other). For example:
V(t) = V for 0 \leq t \leq 0.0025
V(t) = -V for 0.0025 \leq t \leq 0.005

V_{out} = -\frac{1}{RC} [ \int_{0}^{0.0025}Vdt - \int_{0.0025}^{0.005}Vdt]

V_{out} = -\frac{1}{RC} (0.0025V - (0.005V - 0.0025V)) = 0
How can i get around this problem? Cheers.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Exulus said:
Hi guys, I need a bit of help with this. I've got an op-amp and the standard formula:

V_{out} = -\frac{1}{RC}\int V_{in} dt

And i need to integrate a square wave from it in order to determine some capacitor/resistor values to get an output amplitude of 5V and freq 200Hz (triangle wave). Every time i try to do it i end up getting 0 as an answer (which is kind of logical, considering one half of the cycle is the negative of the other). For example:
V(t) = V for 0 \leq t \leq 0.0025
V(t) = -V for 0.0025 \leq t \leq 0.005

V_{out} = -\frac{1}{RC} [ \int_{0}^{0.0025}Vdt - \int_{0.0025}^{0.005}Vdt]

V_{out} = -\frac{1}{RC} [ \int_{0}^{0.0025}Vdt - \int_{0.0025}^{0.005}Vdt]



V_{out}(t) = -\frac{1}{RC} (0.0025V - (0.005V - 0.0025V)) = 0
How can i get around this problem? Cheers.

If you calculate the integral for an entire cycle of the wave you get the area under the curve that is of course 0. What you want is not the integral of one period, but the integral from 0 to a time t, that is a function of t.
V_{out}(t) = -\frac{1}{RC} [ \int_{0}^{t}V(τ)dτ
The function Vout(t) is a triangle wave.
If in the function Vout(t) you replace t by 0.005 you get 0, the value of the integral you have calculated.

edited to inform:
I don't know what happened. Where appears the number 964, there should be the greek letter τ (tau)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SGT, it looks like you used the symbol for tau; however, you have to use \tau in latex. Maybe the latex code on the server messed things up here... 964 is the HTML reference to the greek letter tau.
 
SGT said:
If you calculate the integral for an entire cycle of the wave you get the area under the curve that is of course 0. What you want is not the integral of one period, but the integral from 0 to a time t, that is a function of t.
V_{out}(t) = -\frac{1}{RC} [ \int_{0}^{t}V(\tau)d\tau
The function Vout(t) is a triangle wave.
If in the function Vout(t) you replace t by 0.005 you get 0, the value of the integral you have calculated.

Since I cannot anymore edit my previous post, I am posting again with the corrections provided by faust9. Thank you, Faust.
 
Cheers, i still really don't get what i need to do though. I've got the function for a square wave as stated above, but how do i go about finding an expression for R and C? I know they can pretty much be unlimited as i will just get a ratio between them but i don't really see how i can go about getting that ratio...im completely lost :(
 
You just choose some arbitrary values, J. Doesn't matter as long as the product of the two makes the right number.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K