Integrating Torque With Force as a Function of Radius

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 8K views
ztluhcs
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In this problem, I am asked to find the total torque acting on a device consisting of two open half-cylinders connected to a shaft rotating in a fluid. To clarify, they are half-cylinders in the sense that they have been cut in half in the lengthwise direction and are oriented to generate drag. In the (very rough) picture below the spanwise elements are the two half cylinders (===) and the vertical part is the shaft (++).

=========+========
____________+
____________+
____________+

Homework Equations


T = r x F

F = 1/2 * rho * S_ref * C_D * V^2 = 1/2 * rho * S_ref * C_D * (omega * r)^2

where rho, S_ref, and C_D, the angular velocity (omega), the diameter, and the radius of the cylinder are all known

The Attempt at a Solution



As per my instructor's advice, the force on one cylinder is given in the equation above. Then a differential element of torque would be written as:

dT = 1/2 * rho * S_ref * C_D * (omega * r)^2 * r*dr

integrating over 0 to R should then give the total torque, which is (for both cylinders):

T = 1/4 * C_D * rho * D * omega^2 * R^5

The problem with this solution is that the units are kg*m^3/s^2 and the units of torque are kg*m^2/s^2, so there is some dimensional inconsistency. Instead I was thinking that differential radius in the cross-product should be just dr, but looking back I'm also not sure if it is necessary to take some differential element of the force (which of course itself has velocity as a function of radius. I'm just having some issues applying physical intuition to this fairly complicated situation since the force changes as radius changes.

Thanks for any help,
Ian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, velocity is a function of radius, so you can write F = constants * r^2 so then

dF = 2*constants*r*dr

This would give:

dT = dF x r

dT = 2 * constants * r^2 * dr

T = 2/3 * constants * R^3

which is different than either of my other proposed solutions! Does this seem correct?