Integration by parts with a dxdy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration by parts of the functional ##I(u,v)=\int_\Omega F(x,y,u,v,u_x,u_y, v_x,v_y)dxdy##, specifically addressing the partial variation ##\delta I##. Participants clarify why certain terms, particularly the first and fourth, are not integrated by parts, emphasizing that the integration is performed with respect to x while treating y as constant. The integration by parts is justified by the boundary conditions of the perturbation function and leads to the Euler-Lagrange equation, a fundamental result in the calculus of variations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functional analysis and variational calculus
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and integration techniques
  • Experience with calculus of variations concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Explore the Fundamental Lemma of Calculus of Variations
  • Learn advanced integration techniques in multiple dimensions
  • Investigate the role of boundary conditions in variational problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students interested in variational methods, particularly those studying mechanics and optimization problems in calculus of variations.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



The functional ##I(u,v)=\int_\Omega F(x,y,u,v,u_x,u_y, v_x,v_y)dxdy##

The partial variation of a functional is given as

## \displaystyle \delta I =\int_\Omega (\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \delta u+\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u_x+\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_y} \delta u_y+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \delta v+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v_x} \delta v_x+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v_y} \delta v_y)dxdy##

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The next step in developing this equation is to integrate by parts the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th terms.

1) Why do we not integrate the 1st term since F and ##\delta u## are both functions of x and y, ie a product..? Similarly for the 4th term?

2) For the second term I let ##U= \frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}## and ## \displaystyle dV=\frac{\partial \delta u}{\partial x}## Therefore

## \displaystyle \int_\Omega (\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x} \frac{\partial \delta u_x}{\partial x} )dxdy=\frac{ \partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u - \int_\Omega [\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}) \delta u]dxdy=\int_\Omega [\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\frac{ \partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u) - \frac{\partial }{\partial x}(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}) \delta u]dxdy##

We seem to be integrating wrt x, how do we justify not doing anything with dy...? Becasue F and u are also functions of y..? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might not have *fully* understood the derivation of Euler-Lagrange equation for the classic example of
S(t)=\int_{a}^{b}L(t,x,\dot{x})dt. I'm using the classical mechanics convention here where x is function of t, and \dot{x}=dx/dt, L is Lagrangian.

The integration by part of the selected terms does the following two good things:
1) Make use of the nice boundary conditions of the perturbation function (vanished at both ends)
2) Leave the rest parts to be handled by the Fundamental Lemma of Calculus Of Variations -- Which gives you the Oiler-Lagrange Equation.
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



The functional ##I(u,v)=\int_\Omega F(x,y,u,v,u_x,u_y, v_x,v_y)dxdy##

The partial variation of a functional is given as

## \displaystyle \delta I =\int_\Omega (\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \delta u+\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u_x+\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_y} \delta u_y+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \delta v+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v_x} \delta v_x+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v_y} \delta v_y)dxdy##

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The next step in developing this equation is to integrate by parts the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th terms.

1) Why do we not integrate the 1st term since F and ##\delta u## are both functions of x and y, ie a product..? Similarly for the 4th term?

2) For the second term I let ##U= \frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}## and ## \displaystyle dV=\frac{\partial \delta u}{\partial x}## Therefore

## \displaystyle \int_\Omega (\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x} \frac{\partial \delta u_x}{\partial x} )dxdy=\frac{ \partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u - \int_\Omega [\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}) \delta u]dxdy=\int_\Omega [\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\frac{ \partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u) - \frac{\partial }{\partial x}(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}) \delta u]dxdy##

We seem to be integrating wrt x, how do we justify not doing anything with dy...? Becasue F and u are also functions of y..? Thanks
 
Last edited:
klondike said:
You might not have *fully* understood the derivation of Euler-Lagrange equation for the classic example of
S(t)=\int_{a}^{b}L(t,x,\dot{x})dt. I'm using the classical mechanics convention here where x is function of t, and \dot{x}=dx/dt, L is Lagrangian.

The integration by part of the selected terms does the following two good things:
1) Make use of the nice boundary conditions of the perturbation function (vanished at both ends)

2) Leave the rest parts to be handled by the Fundamental Lemma of Calculus Of Variations -- Which gives you the Oiler-Lagrange Equation.

bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



The functional ##I(u,v)=\int_\Omega F(x,y,u,v,u_x,u_y, v_x,v_y)dxdy##

The partial variation of a functional is given as

## \displaystyle \delta I =\int_\Omega (\frac{\partial F}{\partial u} \delta u+\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u_x+\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_y} \delta u_y+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v} \delta v+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v_x} \delta v_x+\frac{\partial F}{\partial v_y} \delta v_y)dxdy##

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The next step in developing this equation is to integrate by parts the 2nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th terms.

1) Why do we not integrate the 1st term since F and ##\delta u## are both functions of x and y, ie a product..? Similarly for the 4th term?

I see, if I had of read on further I would have spotted this thanks.

bugatti79 said:
2) For the second term I let ##U= \frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}## and ## \displaystyle dV=\frac{\partial \delta u}{\partial x}## Therefore

## \displaystyle \int_\Omega (\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x} \frac{\partial \delta u_x}{\partial x} )dxdy=\frac{ \partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u - \int_\Omega [\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}) \delta u]dxdy=\int_\Omega [\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\frac{ \partial F}{\partial u_x} \delta u) - \frac{\partial }{\partial x}(\frac{\partial F}{\partial u_x}) \delta u]dxdy##

We seem to be integrating wrt x, how do we justify not doing anything with dy...? Becasue F and u are also functions of y..? Thanks

Just on a technical note regarding integrating parts. How do we treat this dxdy arrangement since we do not have a double integral such that we can integrate the inner and then the outer...? We know u is a function of both x and y according to post 1 but we seem to have done nothing with dy...? thanks
 
bugatti79 said:
I see, if I had of read on further I would have spotted this thanks.
You are welcome! This happens a lot in self-studying.

bugatti79 said:
Just on a technical note regarding integrating parts. How do we treat this dxdy arrangement since we do not have a double integral such that we can integrate the inner and then the outer...?
We don't actually integrate the functional because u,v, and their partial derivatives are unknown. Or did I miss your question?

bugatti79 said:
We know u is a function of both x and y according to post 1 but we seem to have done nothing with dy...? thanks
We are dealing with the terms related to first variation of \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}. y is treated as constant.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K