Integration of X^2 exp(-aX^2) from 0 to infinity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of X^2 exp(-aX^2) from 0 to infinity evaluates to \(\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{4 \cdot a^{3/2}}\). This result can be derived using integration by parts and requires handling the limit as the upper bound approaches infinity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding convergence in integrals, particularly when dealing with infinite limits. Rachael Well initiated the inquiry for assistance with her physical chemistry homework, highlighting the practical application of this integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus, particularly infinite limits.
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties.
  • Basic concepts of convergence and divergence in integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integration by parts in detail.
  • Learn about evaluating limits in improper integrals.
  • Explore convergence tests for integrals and series.
  • Review applications of the Gaussian integral in physics and engineering.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physical chemistry, mathematicians, and anyone involved in advanced calculus or integral calculus who seeks to understand the evaluation of integrals with infinite limits.

Rachael_Victoria
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hey can someone tell me the value of the integral of X^2 exp (-aX^2) dx from zero to infinity. I have the general solution from a table of integrals but since the upper limit is infinity, I can't really plug these numbers in. Can't find it in a table of integrals anywhere? If anyone has the answer it would be really great as I could then continue on in my P-chem homework. I also know how to do this with integration by parts, but there is the whole catch of infinity as the upper limit, anything beyond doing integration is past my personal education and capabilities.
Thanks
Rachael
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well

\int_{a}^{\infty} = \lim_{M\rightarrow \infty}\int_{a}^{M}

So I guess you can use the result from your table and evaluate the limit.
 
You are correct in that you have to use Integration By Parts. However, since the upper limit is infinity, you have to use the method for solving infinite limits of integration. In your case, change the upper limit (infinity) to b , then solve the integral. Then you simply take the limit of the result as b goes to infinity (you will have an expression in terms of b since you replaced the upper limit by b). I haven't worked out the problem, but depending on the functions involved, the integral can either converge or diverge (i.e. it would diverge if you had something like lim as b goes to infinity of[1-cos(b)] ). I am guessing in your case if it is required to solve subsequent problems in your homework that it will converge. Hope that helps.
 
Rachael_Victoria said:
Hey can someone tell me the value of the integral of X^2 exp (-aX^2) dx from zero to infinity. I have the general solution from a table of integrals but since the upper limit is infinity, I can't really plug these numbers in. Can't find it in a table of integrals anywhere? If anyone has the answer it would be really great as I could then continue on in my P-chem homework. I also know how to do this with integration by parts, but there is the whole catch of infinity as the upper limit, anything beyond doing integration is past my personal education and capabilities.
Thanks
Rachael

1: \ \ \ \ \int_{0}^{\infty} x^{2} \cdot \exp(-ax^{2}) \, dx \ \ = \ \ \frac{\sqrt{\pi}} {4 \cdot a^{3/2}}


~~
 
Cool thanks everyone.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K