Integration that leads to a inverse trig identity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the integration of the function (x-2)(1/2)/(x+2), leading to the solution 2(x-2).5 - 4tan-1((x-2).5/2) + C. The user initially attempts substitution with u2 = x-2 and u = (x-2).5, but struggles with the integration process, particularly when substituting back. The correct approach involves using u2 = 4z2 and u = 2z, which simplifies the integration and avoids confusion with variable substitution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integration techniques, specifically substitution methods.
  • Familiarity with inverse trigonometric functions, particularly arctangent.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic integration, especially with natural logarithms.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for handling variable substitutions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study integration by substitution in calculus, focusing on variable changes.
  • Learn about inverse trigonometric functions and their derivatives.
  • Explore logarithmic integration techniques, particularly with natural logarithms.
  • Practice problems involving complex substitutions in integration.
USEFUL FOR

Students learning calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques, as well as educators seeking to clarify integration methods involving substitutions and inverse trigonometric identities.

Minutemade
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok, so a teacher showed an example in class awhile back. So I am going over my notes right now, and I don't understand a certain part of the problem.

Also I am new to the forums and its my first time posting here, so please push me in the right direction if i make a mistake.

integration of (x-2)(1/2)/(x+2)

the solution is: 2(x-2).5 - 4tan-1((x-2).5/2) + C

Basically what i tried doing, is:

u2 = x-2
u = (x-2).5
2u du = dx

which after a few steps leads me to:

2u - 8(integration of (u2 +4)-1)

After this i stop understanding the problem a little...
From here i sub the root x-2 back in as u and u2 as x-2, which gives me:

2(x-2).5 - 8ln|x+2| which is wrong i think...

The way the example continues is as such:
u2 = 4z2
u = 2z
du = 2 dz

2u - ((8)(2)/4) integration of dz/ (z2 +1)

which gives the answer given above...

Basically i don't understand why we want to sub in another letter for u2, and why i can't get the same answer when i sub in the (x-2).5 earlier.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Minutemade! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Minutemade said:
2u - 8(integration of (u2 +4)-1)

After this i stop understanding the problem a little...
From here i sub the root x-2 back in as u and u2 as x-2, which gives me:

2(x-2).5 - 8ln|x+2| which is wrong i think...

ah … you forgot to change the du as well. :wink:
Basically i don't understand why we want to sub in another letter for u2

You don't really need to …

most people wouldn't …

but it does stop you making a mistake if you can't remember the general formula! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K