Integrator monotonically increasing ? R.S. Integral

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sihag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Increasing Integral
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
sihag
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Could someone explain why the R.S. Integral is defined for a monotonically increasing integrator? Can't we use a decreasing fuction anologously?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you could. It would just give the negative of the corresponding integral with an increasing integrator.

(For anyone who is wondering, "R.S" is the Riemann-Stieljes integral. It is defined exactly like the Riemann integral except that instead of measuring the size of each interval forming the base of a rectangle as [itex]x_{i+1}- x_i[/itex], we use [itex]\alpha(x_{i+1})-\alpha(x_i)[/itex] where [itex]\alpha(x)[/itex] can be an monotone increasing function of x. It is typically written [itex]\int f(x)d\alpha(x)[/itex]. If [itex]\alpha[/itex] is a differentiable function, the Riemann-Stieljes integral is exactly the same as the Riemann integral [itex]\int f(x) d\alpha/dx dx[/itex]. The interesting situation is when [itex]\alpha[/itex] is not differentiable. In particular, if [itex]\alpha[/itex] is the unit step function, and a and b are integers, then [itex]\int_a^b f(x) d\alpha= f(a)+ f(a+1)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ f(b)[/itex].)