Interaction between science and religion in the 17th century

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction between science and religion during the 17th century, focusing on historical examples that illustrate this relationship. The original poster is seeking examples beyond Galileo's trial and is exploring the complexity of this interaction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest various historical figures and concepts, including Copernicus, Descartes, Pascal, and Spinoza, while questioning their relevance to the 17th century. There is also a discussion about the definitions of Cartesian duality and rationalism, and how these concepts relate to religion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing examples and clarifications. Some guidance has been offered regarding historical figures and concepts, but there is still a lack of consensus on specific examples and their implications for the science-religion interaction.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has multiple textbooks but notes a lack of specific discussions on the interaction between science and religion within them. There is an emphasis on the need for 17th-century examples, which may limit the scope of the discussion.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
I am writing an essay for a course regarding the history and philosophy of science. The topic is:
"During the 17th century, there was intense interaction between science and religion. Using examples, mount an argument that takes a position on this interaction. In other words, with reference to some hisotrical examples, discuss whether you regard this relationship as positive, negative, or a combination of both."

What I get from this is that the examples must be from the 17th century. I am only aware of Galileo's trial, the conflict with the church of whether the Earth is stationary or moving. Other than this, I am feeling blank. I can't think of any other figures with examples of interaction between science and religion, can someone kindly remind me of some other examples?

Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks for helping!:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you're forgetting that galilieo wrote a book called a dialogue on two world systems copernicus v ptolemy , so copernicus had something to do with it. descartes came up with about the cartesian duality, and rationalism basically, pascal argued for god, benedict spinoza did too. don't you have a textbook? mine has a chapter in it just about this.
 
ice109 said:
you're forgetting that galilieo wrote a book called a dialogue on two world systems copernicus v ptolemy , so copernicus had something to do with it. descartes came up with about the cartesian duality, and rationalism basically, pascal argued for god, benedict spinoza did too. don't you have a textbook? mine has a chapter in it just about this.

Copernicus is a good example, but not a 17th century figure...
For Descartes, what are cartesian duality and rationalism? I haven't come across these terms yet...

And yes, I have 5 textbooks for this course, but there aren't any specific discussion between science and religion.
 
kingwinner said:
Copernicus is a good example, but not a 17th century figure...
For Descartes, what are cartesian duality and rationalism? I haven't come across these terms yet...

And yes, I have 5 textbooks for this course, but there aren't any specific discussion between science and religion.

galileo's word system was based on copernicus' ideas. cartesian duality is that you cannot be sure of the senses only your brain "i think therefore i am". rationalism is the consequent of that, everything has to be rationally, by the brain, proved. this obviously meant that mysticism was out. look up pascal's wager. honestly the real push for secularism was made by the philosophes not the scientists
 
ice109 said:
galileo's word system was based on copernicus' ideas. cartesian duality is that you cannot be sure of the senses only your brain "i think therefore i am". rationalism is the consequent of that, everything has to be rationally, by the brain, proved. this obviously meant that mysticism was out. look up pascal's wager. honestly the real push for secularism was made by the philosophes not the scientists

Oh, I see! :smile:
But how do they relate to religion?
 
Don't forget Giordano Bruno
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K