Interested in learning quantum but

  • Thread starter Thread starter torquerotates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the prerequisites and recommended resources for self-studying quantum mechanics, particularly for someone with a limited background in physics and mathematics. Participants explore various introductory texts and their suitability for different levels of understanding.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether their background in calculus, differential equations, and introductory physics is sufficient to begin learning quantum mechanics independently.
  • Another participant suggests starting with an "introductory modern physics" book, emphasizing the importance of historical context and motivation before tackling more rigorous texts.
  • A participant questions the suitability of Griffiths' textbook for their level of understanding, linking to the book for reference.
  • Another participant expresses a favorable opinion of Griffiths, noting that while it is a solid junior-level book, it may not cover certain topics like Dirac notation comprehensively. They recommend reading it alongside Gasiorowicz for a more thorough understanding.
  • One participant proposes "Quantum Physics" by Eisberg and Resnick as a good starting point, highlighting its accessible introduction to pre-quantum concepts.
  • A participant reflects on their own mathematical standing and asks if it is appropriate to dive into Griffiths, while also considering the feasibility of studying both Griffiths and Gasiorowicz over a summer period.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the appropriateness of different textbooks for learning quantum mechanics, with no consensus on a single best approach or resource. Some advocate for a combination of texts, while others suggest starting with less rigorous material.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of historical context and motivation in learning quantum mechanics, indicating that different texts may serve different purposes in a learner's journey. There is also uncertainty regarding the depth of coverage in various recommended books.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals with a foundational understanding of calculus and introductory physics who are considering self-studying quantum mechanics and are seeking guidance on appropriate resources and study strategies.

torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Interested in learning quantum but...

I have only taken calculus, single and multi variable, differential equations and a first course in linear algebra. My physics back ground includes calc based intro mechanics( without waves and ocillations) and electricity and magnetism.

Am I set to start learning quantum mechanics on my own?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes! You might want to start by picking up an "introductory modern physics" book of the type that is often used for sophomore (second-year) level courses, right after the introductory mechanics / E&M courses. The QM isn't very rigorous in those books, but they do include background and historical material that is often skimmed over rapidly in "real" QM books, which will give you some motivation for the more rigorous mathematical treatment. Then you can move on to a book that has more details.

Don't expect to learn everything about QM in one go. There's much to be said for cycling through the material two or three times, with increasing depth and sophistication.
 
I like Griffiths. It is a great junior level book. It explains things well, but it kinda skims over dirac notation which is very important, along with some other important topics. My suggestion is to concurrently read Griffith's and Gasiorowicz. https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471057002/?tag=pfamazon01-20Gasiorowicz covers more material, but does not explain things as well as Griffith's. Together, I think they are unbeatable.

jtbell was suggesting (I think) a sophomore level book along the lines of Serway's "Modern Physics":

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0534493394/?tag=pfamazon01-20

This is a level below Griffith's and Gasiorowicz. It does not cover Quantum mechanics in depth, but it provides an historical context and a good first introduction.
 
Last edited:
I suggest quantum physics by Eisberg and Resnick. It starts off with pre quantum material(planck radiation, photoelectric effect, Bohr atom etc) and explains the motivation behind the quantum theory. It is also very readable and easy on the begginner.
 
Well, I would say that I have a junior level standing in terms of math.( I've finished all of lower div math). So is it ok to just go into Griffith?

My suggestion is to concurrently read Griffith's and Gasiorowicz

If so, is it doable to go through these books the summer(i.e 2 months) before school starts?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K