MHB Interesting Result in Quantum Error Correcting Codes versus Relativistic Gravity

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around an article that explores the intersection of quantum mechanics and gravity, highlighting the ongoing interest in unifying these concepts despite skepticism about the frequency of such announcements. Participants express a mix of cynicism and curiosity, acknowledging the potential significance of the findings while emphasizing the importance of continued exploration in the field. The mention of conformal field theories (CFTs) indicates a deeper engagement with the topic, suggesting that understanding these theories is crucial for grasping the complexities of quantum gravity. Overall, the conversation reflects a balance between critical analysis and the pursuit of knowledge in theoretical physics.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Thought you all might be interested in this article. It could just be hype, but there also might be something deeper to it. You hear of so many schemes of tying together quantum mechanics with a relativistic understanding of gravity, that it's easy to respond to yet another announcement like this one with some cynicism. It's still worthwhile looking at them, in my opinion.

Note that the actual arXiv article is here (linked to from within the quanta article).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you! That was excellent. And now I finally understand why we bother with CFTs. (I need a teacher!)

-Dan
 

Thread 'Why do we spend so little time learning grammar in college?'

To some degree, this thread is inspired by PF user erobz's thread "Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?" That's why I made a title to this thread that paralleled the title of erobz's thread. I totally disagree with erobz. I created this thread because the curriculum of grammar at Universities is a totally distinct topic from the topic of the curriculum of grammar in public schools. I have noticed that the English grammar of many ( perhaps most)...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Two recent tests of loop quantum gravity theory
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
I The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
B Is spacetime a quantum error correcting code?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
A Loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Pentagons, hexagons, quantum gravity, AdS/CFT
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Asymptotic safety and loop quantum gravity
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
A LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
22K
B QFT & QM Questions (about time, locality, gravity, etc.)
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
An interesting new paper on f(X) gravity
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
LQG has not been shown to violate the holographic principle
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K