Interesting Thoughts on Objects & Speed of Light

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kingofxbox99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting Thoughts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of objects moving at relativistic speeds and the implications of the speed of light on mass and acceleration. Participants explore thought experiments related to applying constant force to an object and the resulting effects as it approaches the speed of light, touching on classical and relativistic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a thought experiment where a box is pushed with a constant force in a frictionless environment, suggesting that as it approaches the speed of light, its mass would approach infinity, leading to zero acceleration.
  • Another participant counters that the box will never reach the speed of light, stating that its acceleration will slow down as it approaches the speed of light and emphasizes the need to use relativistic momentum rather than the classical formula F=ma.
  • A later reply questions the validity of the idea that mass approaches infinity, suggesting that this notion is a misunderstanding of relativity.
  • Several participants express frustration with the simplifications found in high school physics, noting that classical physics is often taught before introducing relativity due to the complexity involved.
  • One participant introduces a different perspective, arguing that if a box were to reach the speed of light, its mass would not approach infinity but rather zero, leading to a situation where there would be nothing left to accelerate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of approaching the speed of light, particularly regarding mass and acceleration. There is no consensus on the interpretations of mass behavior at relativistic speeds, and multiple competing views remain present in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in high school physics education, particularly the reliance on simplified formulas like F=ma, which may not adequately represent relativistic scenarios. The discussion also highlights the challenges of teaching complex concepts without the use of calculus.

kingofxbox99
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was thinking, and somehow I had this little "thought experiment" type thing relating to objects and the speed of light. (This is just my thoughts, I don't know if it's correct or the validity of my assumptions, etc)

Imagine you're in a (large) room, and that the effects of friction, air resistance, etc. are nonexistant. You walk up to a box at the end of the room, and apply a constant force to it. If the force remains constant, the acceleration will remain constant. Eventually, the box's velocity will get close to the speed of light. Once it hits the speed of light, it's acceleration will instantly drop to 0, and in order to maintain a constant force, it's mass will approach infinity (F = ma). Is this why people always say that your mass would approach infinity as you approach the speed of light? Just a cool little thought I had. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kingofxbox99 said:
Imagine you're in a (large) room, and that the effects of friction, air resistance, etc. are nonexistant. You walk up to a box at the end of the room, and apply a constant force to it. If the force remains constant, the acceleration will remain constant. Eventually, the box's velocity will get close to the speed of light. Once it hits the speed of light, it's acceleration will instantly drop to 0, and in order to maintain a constant force, it's mass will approach infinity (F = ma).
The box will never reach the speed of light. Instead, its acceleration will gradually slow and it will get closer to the speed of light without ever quite getting there.

You cannot use ##F=ma## here; that's a simplified formula that only works for speeds that are small compared with the speed of light. For your problem, you have to make two changes:

First, you have to use the more general ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## where ##p## is the momentum, instead of ##F=ma##.

Second you have to use the relativistic definition of momentum: ##p=\gamma{m}{v}## where ##\gamma## is ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}## (I'm measuring distances in light-years and times in years so that the speed of light is one in this formula).

Note that if ##v## is small these formulas reduce to the familiar ##F=ma##. But in your problem, ##v## is not small.

Is this why people always say that your mass would approach infinity as you approach the speed of light?
No. The people who say that are repeating something that they heard from someone else who also doesn't understand relativity. (Or they understand relativity and are really terrible teachers).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for explaining that! I hate how simplified everything is at the high school level...
 
kingofxbox99 said:
Thanks for explaining that! I hate how simplified everything is at the high school level...

It's necessary, as it is far easier to learn something like F=MA instead of the relativistic version at that level. You have to walk before you can run, after all. Besides, for everyday physics the classical version you learn in high school works just fine.
 
kingofxbox99 said:
Thanks for explaining that! I hate how simplified everything is at the high school level...

Well, you do have to have classical physics down cold before you're ready to take on relativity, so we teach it first.

Another complication is that many high-school students have not yet had a full year of calculus, so we can't use calculus, just trignometry and algebra. That makes it hard, especially when you consider that when Newton was figuring out classical mechanics, he needed calculus so badly that he had to invent it. ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## is the most powerful and general expression of Newton's second law; but if you don't have calculus you have to settle for ##F=ma##, which falls out of ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## if you remember that classically ##p=mv## and assume a constant mass.
 
kingofxbox99 said:
You walk up to a box at the end of the room, and apply a constant force to it. If the force remains constant, the acceleration will remain constant. Eventually, the box's velocity will get close to the speed of light. Once it hits the speed of light, it's acceleration will instantly drop to 0, and in order to maintain a constant force, it's mass will approach infinity (F = ma).

That's a very interesting question. When starting from rest the box will be accelerated according to

[tex]a = \frac{F}{m}\sqrt {1 - \frac{{v^2 }}{{c^2 }}} ^3[/tex]

F and a can only remain constant if m is decreased with velocity (e.g. by emission of radiation) according to

[tex]m = m_0 \cdot \sqrt {1 - \frac{{v^2 }}{{c^2 }}} ^3[/tex]

That means when the box reaches the speed of light its mass doesn't approaches infinity but zero. Moreover, energy goes zero too:

[tex]E = m_0 \cdot \left( {c^2 - v^2 } \right)[/tex]

Thus there would be nothing left to accelerate or to apply a force to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K