Interface conditions on a graphene interface

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving boundary conditions for P polarization in a 2D problem involving an infinite dielectric cylinder coated with graphene. Key conditions include the continuity of the tangential electric field and the relationship between the tangential magnetic fields, which incorporates a term for surface current due to graphene's conductivity. The user struggles with the equations, particularly how the derivatives of the magnetic fields relate across the interface and the role of the dielectric constants. Clarification is provided that the tangential components of both electric and magnetic fields must be considered to accurately apply the boundary conditions. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of interface conditions in electromagnetic theory.
svletana
Messages
20
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm trying to do all the calculations for the attached paper, and I'm having trouble with the boundary conditions for P polarization. My question is, how can I arrive to those conditions? The problem is 2D, an infinite dielectric cylinder coated with a layer of graphene, surrounded by another dielectric, and we analyze the cross section as a 2 dimensional problem. This would be for the theory section of the paper only.

Homework Equations


I understand that for this mode the conditions are E_z = 0 everywhere and \frac{dH_z}{dr}<br /> \Big|_1 = \frac{dH_z}{dr}\Big|_2 at the interface (this is condition 1). Also there's the Maxwell equation:
\nabla \times \textbf{H} = \frac{-i \omega}{c} \textbf{D} (condition 2). Also the paper says the tangential component of E is continuous across the interface, and the tangential component of H has a "jump" across the interface that's proportional to the surface current of graphene.

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with the Maxwell equation, using cylindrical coordinates for the curl and also using that H is in the z direction only:

\frac{1}{r} \frac{dH_z}{d \phi} \hat{r} - \frac{dH_z}{dr} \hat{\phi} = \frac{-iw}{c} \epsilon \textbf{D}

now I calculate the difference between both media and evaluate at the interface, r=R. The dependence of the field on the variable \phi is e^{i n \phi}.

\frac{i n}{R} (H_{z_1} - H_{z_2}) \hat{r} - \left ( \frac{dH_{z_1}}{dr} - \frac{dH_{z_2}}{dr} \right ) \hat{\phi} = \frac{-i \omega}{c} \left ( \epsilon_1 D_1 - \epsilon_2 D_2 \right )

Now, from condition 1 the \hat{\phi} term on the left of the equation should be zero, which tells us the derivatives respect to r are the same for both media, but in the paper there's the epsilons dividing each derivative as well. Also since the tangential component of E is continuous then the right side of the equation is zero as well?

I don't seem to be arriving at the same conditions as they are stated on the paper, and I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong! Interface conditions are hard :(
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
A:You have to consider the boundary conditions for the tangential $\mathbf E$ and $\mathbf H$ fields. The boundary conditions for the tangential $\mathbf E$ field are given by$$\mathbf E^{\parallel}_{1} = \mathbf E^{\parallel}_{2},$$where $\mathbf E^{\parallel}_{1}$ and $\mathbf E^{\parallel}_{2}$ denote the tangential components of the electric field in the two media at the interface, respectively. Similarly, the boundary conditions for the tangential $\mathbf H$ field are given by$$\mathbf H^{\parallel}_{1} = \mathbf H^{\parallel}_{2} + \frac{i \omega}{c} \sigma \mathbf E^{\parallel}_{\text{avg}},$$where $\mathbf H^{\parallel}_{1}$ and $\mathbf H^{\parallel}_{2}$ denote the tangential components of the magnetic field in the two media at the interface, respectively, and $\mathbf E^{\parallel}_{\text{avg}} = \frac{1}{2}\left(\mathbf E^{\parallel}_{1}+\mathbf E^{\parallel}_{2}\right)$. The last term on the RHS of the equation is due to the presence of a surface current on the graphene layer. Here, $\sigma$ denotes the surface conductivity of the graphene layer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
842
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K