Intermolecular forces > trends in London Dispersion Forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between molecular size, molecular weight, and London Dispersion Forces (LDF). It is established that larger molecules exhibit greater polarizability due to a higher number of electrons and increased distance from the nucleus, leading to stronger dispersion forces. The confusion arises from the differing trends of atomic size and atomic weight across periods and groups in the periodic table. Ultimately, dispersion forces increase with molecular size, which is more influenced by the number of atoms in a molecule rather than just atomic weight.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of molecular size and polarizability
  • Familiarity with London Dispersion Forces
  • Knowledge of periodic table trends, including atomic size and atomic weight
  • Basic concepts of organic chemistry and molecular structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of polarizability in different molecular structures
  • Study the trends in intermolecular forces across the periodic table
  • Explore the differences between London Dispersion Forces and other types of intermolecular forces
  • Investigate the impact of molecular structure on physical properties in organic chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals interested in understanding intermolecular forces, particularly in organic molecules and their behavior in different chemical contexts.

CaptainZappo
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
My chemistry textbook states the following:

"In general, larger molecules tend to have greater polarizabilities because they have a greater number of electrons and their electrons are farther from the nuclei. The strength of the dispersion forces, therefore, tends to increase with increasing molecular size. Because molecular size and mass generally parallel each other, dispersion forces tend to increase in strength with increasing molecular weight."

This seems to go against what I have previously learned. Atomic size does increases as one moves down a group (due to the addition of extra shells); however, as one moves across a period, atomic size tends to decrease (due to a larger Z effective). Now, atomic weight increases both down a group and across a period. Thus, these two are not always parallels of each other.

If dispersion forces are proportional to molecular size, why don't they decrease along a period and increase down a group?

Thanks for any insight,
-Zachary Lindsey

NOTE: Bold words were changed after Gokul43201's response. Thanks for pointing that out, Gokul43201.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Where is a molecule located in the periodic table?

The above passage is most likely written in the context of organic molecules. You do not increase molecular size/mass by switching elements as much as by simply having more atoms per molecule. CH3OH is smaller than C4H9OH, because the latter just has more atoms in it.
 
Thank you. That makes sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
30K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K