International Proliferation of Anti ICBM Lasers

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kmarinas86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    International Lasers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the international proliferation of anti-ICBM laser technology, emphasizing its advantages over traditional missile defense systems. Participants argue that lasers can be mass-produced for redundancy and are faster than rockets, making them a viable option for missile defense. The Boeing Airborne Laser System (ABL) is highlighted as a significant development, capable of targeting multiple missiles, although concerns about atmospheric interference and operational effectiveness are raised. The conversation also touches on the potential obsolescence of nuclear weapons if laser systems are widely adopted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of laser technology and its applications in defense systems.
  • Familiarity with missile defense systems, particularly the Boeing Airborne Laser System (ABL).
  • Knowledge of the engineering challenges associated with high-energy lasers.
  • Awareness of the implications of missile defense on global security dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational capabilities and limitations of the Boeing Airborne Laser System (ABL).
  • Explore the engineering challenges in developing high-energy laser systems for missile defense.
  • Investigate the effectiveness of various laser frequencies and coatings for missile interception.
  • Examine the geopolitical implications of widespread adoption of laser-based missile defense systems.
USEFUL FOR

Defense analysts, military strategists, engineers in aerospace and defense sectors, and policymakers interested in missile defense technologies and their global implications.

  • #31
slugcountry said:
Are ICBM's vulnerable to emp?

Not anymore i think. Both sides during the Cold War had the idea to detonate nuclear weapons in the atmosphere hoping the EMP would disrupt the enemies missiles. Since it's fairly easy to shield things against EMP, I'm sure both sides have hardened their missiles for EMP attacks.

Also, the idea of tossing up and detonating multiple nuclear weapons into the atmosphere as a deterent was found to be rather impractical.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 490 ·
17
Replies
490
Views
41K
Replies
10
Views
5K