Interperating a graph with logarithmic scales

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehilge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Logarithmic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around interpreting a graph that utilizes logarithmic scales, specifically in the context of determining time values based on intervals represented on the graph. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the reading of logarithmic scales and seeks clarification on their approach to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate time values based on logarithmic intervals and questions the accuracy of their method. They inquire about potential interpolation techniques for greater precision and whether there are better approaches to the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide feedback on the original poster's calculations, suggesting that while they are on the right track, there may be inaccuracies in their time estimates. There is a recognition of the need for precision in measurements, and a suggestion is made to use a ruler for more accurate data points.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions specific temperature values and the use of intervals in their calculations, indicating a structured approach to interpreting the graph. However, there is an acknowledgment of potential limitations in measurement precision when working with logarithmic scales.

ehilge
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


see attachment


Homework Equations


log10x=y
10y=x


The Attempt at a Solution


Since I'm rather confused on reading a logarithmic scale, I thought I'd post this to see if I'm doing this right and/or if there's a better way to do the problem.

a) T=500 C
using the # of intervals we can say that if d=.01, x=.5 intervals so...
log(t)=.5
t=3.16 min

similarly for d=.1
log(t)=3.5 intervals
t=3162

change in time = 3162-3.16 = 3158.8min

b) same process but use x=-.5 intervals and x=2.1

If this method does work, is there any way to interpolate values so I can be more exact? or is there a better way to do the problem in general?
thanks!
 

Attachments

  • logarithmic scale.jpg
    logarithmic scale.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 443
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're on the right track, but maybe just a little off. For the 500 degree track (part a), the starting time is about 3.2 min, but the ending time looks to me like about 3.6, which corresponds to about 4000 min. Subtracting gives a duration that's again close to 4000 min. Unless you can really measure the position of the points very precisely, it doesn't make sense to end up with answers with more than one or two places of precision.
 
yah, I was worried about being able to get a precise enough answer to matter. I think later I'll find a ruler and figure out more exact data points
thanks!
 
Yes, a ruler would help you get more precise answers.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K