Interpretation of complex wave number

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
MaAl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear forum members,

I'm wondering about the physical meaning of the imaginary part of a complex wave number (e.g., the context of fluid dynamics or acoustics). It is obvious that

[tex]w = \hat{w} \mathrm{e}^{i k_z z}[/tex]

describes an undamped wave if [tex]k_z = \Re(k_z)[/tex] and an evanescent wave if [tex]k_z = \Im(k_z)[/tex].

If [tex]k_z = \Re(k_z)[/tex] is proportional to the energy of the wave, can I interpret
[tex]k_z = \Im(k_z)[/tex] as a kind of dissipation/reduction of energy per length z?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\Re(K_z)## is proportional to the wavelength of wave and ##\Im(K_z)## as you say , relates to the energy reduction per length z.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MaAl
Delta² said:
##\Re(K_z)## is proportional to the wavelength of wave and ##\Im(K_z)## as you say , relates to the energy reduction per length z.

Or energy increase, in the case of an unstable wave. ##\Im(k_z)## needn't be positive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MaAl and Delta2