Interpretation of the maximum value of a CDF

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) in the context of a uniformly distributed random variable representing the arrival time of a bus. Participants explore the implications of a CDF indicating a probability of 1 for the bus arriving within a specified time interval, addressing the nuances of probability theory and conditional probabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the CDF indicates a probability of 1 that the bus arrives within 10 minutes, questioning whether this guarantees the bus's arrival in that interval.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the assumption of the bus arriving within 10 minutes is just that—an assumption—and does not need to be physically realistic.
  • A participant distinguishes between the initial probability of 1/10 for each minute and the conditional probability after waiting some time, suggesting that this changes the probabilities involved.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how conditional probabilities are formulated after waiting for a while.
  • Another participant clarifies that while an event having a probability of 1 suggests high likelihood, it does not equate to certainty, referencing logical principles to illustrate this point.
  • Participants discuss the interpretation of probability density functions (pdfs), noting that the value of a pdf at a specific point does not represent the probability of that exact value occurring.
  • One participant acknowledges their misunderstanding regarding the implications of a probability of 1, realizing it does not mean the event will definitely occur.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of a probability of 1 in relation to certainty of occurrence. There is no consensus on the interpretation of conditional probabilities and the implications of the pdf in this context, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations in understanding probability, particularly in distinguishing between theoretical constructs and practical interpretations. There are unresolved aspects regarding the formulation of conditional probabilities and the implications of probability density functions.

dranglerangus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was watching a youtube video from MIT's open courseware series on probability. A scenario was proposed: Al is waiting for a bus. The probability that the bus arrives in x minutes is described by the random variable X, which is uniformly distributed on the interval [0,10] (in minutes).

I understand that the cdf of this function is F(x) = {0 for x<0}, {x for 0≤x≤10}, and {1 for x>10}.

This says that the probability is 1 that x≤10, or equivalently that x∈[0,10], right? So does this mean that the bus definitely arrived between 0 and 10 minutes? This seems counter-intuitive, since at any given moment Al was waiting, the probability that the bus would show up was 1/10. To me, this doesn't seem to guarantee that the bus would have to show up at some time in that interval.

The probability laws guarantee that the bus will come within 10 minutes, but it doesn't seem right to me. Am I understanding this incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The assumption that the bus will definitely arrive in ten minutes is just that - an assumption. For the purpose of doing mathematics, one can assume anything consistent with the rules of probability. It does not have to be physically realistic.

Also you need to distinguish between probability at the start (1/10 for each minute) and conditional probability after he has been waiting a while (after waiting 6 minutes the probability for each of the remaining minutes is now 1/4).
 
mathman said:
The assumption that the bus will definitely arrive in ten minutes is just that - an assumption. For the purpose of doing mathematics, one can assume anything consistent with the rules of probability. It does not have to be physically realistic.

Also you need to distinguish between probability at the start (1/10 for each minute) and conditional probability after he has been waiting a while (after waiting 6 minutes the probability for each of the remaining minutes is now 1/4).

Hmm...weird. It doesn't seem like the probability should change just because he has been waiting a while. How would you formulate that conditional probability?
 
dranglerangus said:
{x for 0≤x≤10}

Should be "x/10"

This says that the probability is 1 that x≤10, or equivalently that x∈[0,10], right?

Yes.

So does this mean that the bus definitely arrived between 0 and 10 minutes?

From a practical point of view, yes.

However, in mathematics there is a technical difference between an event having probability 1 and an event being a definite fact. For example, in logic we have the rule modus ponens which says

If A ithen B
A
-----
Therefore B

where A and B are statements.

However there is no rule of loic that says

If A then B
A is true with probability 1
-----
Therefore B

This seems counter-intuitive, since at any given moment Al was waiting, the probability that the bus would show up was 1/10.

That is not a correct interpretation of the probability density function f(x) = 1/10. The value of a pdf at a particular x is not the probability that the value x will actually be realized.

By analogy, if the mass density of a 10 meter rod is 1/10 kg per meter, this does not mean that the weight of the rod "at" x = 3 meters is 1/10 kg.

Many rules of probability can be remembered by thinking of the pdf f(x) as giving "the probability of x", however this occasionally will lead to wrong conclusions. It's analogous to thinking of dy and dx in calculus as "infinitesimal numbers" That's useful, but it isn't an infallible way of reasoning.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Should be "x/10"
Whoops!

However, in mathematics there is a technical difference between an event having probability 1 and an event being a definite fact. For example, in logic we have the rule modus ponens which says

If A ithen B
A
-----
Therefore B

where A and B are statements.

However there is no rule of loic that says

If A then B
A is true with probability 1
-----
Therefore B

This is really what I was asking, I guess. I didn't realize that saying "event A has probability 1" was not the same as saying "A will definitely occur."

That is not a correct interpretation of the probability density function f(x) = 1/10. The value of a pdf at a particular x is not the probability that the value x will actually be realized.

By analogy, if the mass density of a 10 meter rod is 1/10 kg per meter, this does not mean that the weight of the rod "at" x = 3 meters is 1/10 kg.

Many rules of probability can be remembered by thinking of the pdf f(x) as giving "the probability of x", however this occasionally will lead to wrong conclusions. It's analogous to thinking of dy and dx in calculus as "infinitesimal numbers" That's useful, but it isn't an infallible way of reasoning.

Yeah, I wasn't thinking that through very well when I posted it. I guess what I meant was that for any interval of time with length n (for example, any given period of 1 minute) the probability was n/10 that the bus would show. I was confused because this doesn't seem to suggest the bus has to come at all. But you answered my question with your statement above. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K