Interrupting a standing wave at a node

Click For Summary
Pinching a taut string at its midpoint creates a node, preventing wave propagation past that point due to the fixed displacement. When the string is vibrated, the energy is redistributed, allowing the standing wave to continue without interruption after the pinch is released. The discussion reveals that while pinching enforces zero displacement, it also affects the coupling of tensions between the two halves of the string. This leads to the conclusion that energy transmission is not entirely halted, as real materials can still transmit energy despite being anchored. The nuances of how pinching versus touching the string affects wave behavior are also highlighted, emphasizing the complexity of wave dynamics in practical scenarios.
Zorodius
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
Suppose you have a taut string, and you pinch it firmly at the middle, so that the middle is immobile but the string has the same tension throughout.

Then you start vibrating one end of the string. I would think that the wave could not propagate past the middle of the string, because you have fixed that point. The second half of the string won't move for that reason.

So instead, you stop pinching the string, and allow the vibrations to occur at such a frequency as to activate the second mode of oscillation of your string.

With this mode in action, you once again pinch the string in the middle. The standing wave will continue uninterrupted, because this point was a node - it was fixed anyway.

This is a very unintuitive result to me. I would intuitively think that pinching the string would somehow isolate the two halves from one another, and make it impossible for energy to be supplied from the initial end to affect the opposite end, but this is not so. The best explanation that has come to me is that, although the displacement and velocity of the infinitesimal pinched segment is held to be zero, its tension oscillates, and this enables energy to be transmitted through it. Is this the explanation, or is there something else to it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a very unintuitive result to me. I would intuitively think that pinching the string would somehow isolate the two halves from one another, and make it impossible for energy to be supplied from the initial end to affect the opposite end, but this is not so.
After you let go of the pinch, energy got redistributed. After the second pinch both parts would continue to vibrate, but at an amplitude lower than at the half you started with before unpinching.

I don't see a problem, unless I'm missing something.
 
Zorodius said:
This is a very unintuitive result to me. I would intuitively think that pinching the string would somehow isolate the two halves from one another, and make it impossible for energy to be supplied from the initial end to affect the opposite end, but this is not so.
Why should pinching prevent energy from traversing the midpoint? All that the pinching ensures is that the displacement be zero there.
 
It doesn't look to me like energy is being transmitted across the pinch. (Gokul, pinching should also prevent tensions on either side being coupled.)
 
Remember what a standing wave is. It's a left-travelling wave and a right-travelling wave. You have to have both in place before you get a standing wave. When you pluck the string to start the 2nd harmonic vibration, there is a transient period before the node forms in the middle, right?

Does that help to answer the question? The displacement in the middle is only zero after the 2nd traveling wave comes back and the system settles.
 
I think cesiumfrog hits the nail on the head, if you pinch a section of the string, the tension from one half is no longer "connected" or coupled to the second half, which results in the wave being unable to propagate past the "pinch".

In short - pinching at the node has a drastic effect on the system, it is not as passive as it may first appear.

Claude.
 
Gokul43201 said:
Why should pinching prevent energy from traversing the midpoint? All that the pinching ensures is that the displacement be zero there.

That depends what the OP means by "pinch" and whether we are talking about an idealised thought experiement or a real experiment.

You could interpret "pinching" the string (between finger and thumb) as enforcing zero displacement and zero slope, compared with "touching" the string which enforces zero displacement but not zero slope.

With that interpretation, pinching would stop energy transmission in a transverse wave, but touching would not.

But in practice you would not completely stop rotation of something like a vibrating guitar string by pinching with your fingers, so there would still be some energy tranmission.
 
cesiumfrog said:
It doesn't look to me like energy is being transmitted across the pinch. (Gokul, pinching should also prevent tensions on either side being coupled.)
I believe this is only true for a medium with zero stiffness. Most real materials, (guitar strings, electrical cables, plumbing lines) however, will transmit energy past a point that is rigidly anchored.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K