Intersection of a circle and a sine curve

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the number of intersection points between a sine curve and a circle defined by the equations y=sin(x) and (x-a)² + (y-b)² = r². Participants explore the complexity introduced by the sine function, noting that while a quadratic equation typically has at most two solutions, the sine curve's periodic nature complicates this. Graphical analysis suggests that circles can intersect the sine curve at varying points, with some scenarios yielding more than 16 intersections. The original problem's wording is criticized for its ambiguity regarding whether it asks for a maximum number of intersections across all possible circles. Ultimately, the consensus is that the problem's phrasing could lead to multiple interpretations, complicating the solution process.
vcsharp2003
Messages
906
Reaction score
178
Homework Statement
What is the maximum number of points at which a circle and the graph of ##y =\sin{x}## can intersect?
Relevant Equations
##y =\sin{x}##
##(x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2##
The question is asking for the number of different solutions to the following two equations.
$$y=\sin{x}$$
$$(x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2$$

Solving these is complex for me due to one of the equations being a trigonometric function. If I substitute y from the first equation into the second equation, I get the following.
$$(x-a)^2 + (\sin{x}-b)^2 = r^2$$
$$x^2-2ax+a^2 + \sin^{2}{x} -2b\sin{x} +b^2 = r^2$$
$$(x^2 + \sin^{2}{x})-2(ax+b\sin{x}) +(a^2 + b^2) = r^2$$

Normally an equation of degree 2 would have at most two different solutions, but even though the above equation is of degree 2 in ##x##, the introduction of ##\sin{x} ## probably means its not. I am stuck beyond this, so please help.

Can someone help me determine the number of different solutions?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I saw the answer at once without using any Math.
I suggest drawing a picture using different size circles.
If you are still stuck later today, say so and I will pass you another clue.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes OmCheeto, vcsharp2003 and Mark44
.Scott said:
I saw the answer at once without using any Math.
I suggest drawing a picture using different size circles.
If you are still stuck later today, say so and I will pass you another clue.
I tried your recommendation on the desmos.com graphing calculator and I was always getting 2 points of intersection for various circles that I tried.

Below are three scenarios that I tried, and they all always intersect at two points. But logically, I cannot arrive at this conclusion of two points. Also, I can understand that if the circle has its center very distant above or below the x or y axis and having a small enough radius then such a circle would have no intersection points with the sine curve.
Screenshot_2025-07-12-21-19-35-07_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.webp
Screenshot_2025-07-12-21-17-18-49_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.webp
Screenshot_2025-07-12-21-16-00-11_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.webp
 
Now imagine a huge circle where the top is practically a straight line. Shift it down so that the top is practically on top of the X-axis. How many times can it intersect that sin wave?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
FactChecker said:
[SPOILER="Now imagine a huge circle where the top is practically a straight line. Shift it down so that the top is practically on top of the X-axis. How many times can it intersect that sin wave?"
[/SPOILER]
If it's a straight line there would be many peaks of the sin wave that it would touch. If we take it further down so it is on the x-axis then also there would be many points on the sine curve that it would intersect.
 
vcsharp2003 said:
If it's a straight line there would be many peaks of the sin wave that it would touch. If we take it further down so it is on the x-axis then also there would be many points on the sine curve that it would intersect.
Right. Is the problem statement complete and accurate?
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
.Scott said:
I saw the answer at once without using any Math.
I suggest drawing a picture using different size circles.
If you are still stuck later today, say so and I will pass you another clue.
Please give me the clue as I have tried your suggestion, but still I can't see the logic.
 
FactChecker said:
Right. Is the problem statement complete and accurate?
Yes, the problem seems accurate. It's a challenge problem in a high school text book.
 
vcsharp2003 said:
Yes, the problem seems accurate. It's a challenge problem in a high school text book.
You didn't try to move the circle. The problem statement doesn't forbid this.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
  • #11
Over the range of allowable a, b, r, parameters there is no maximum. It might be possible to determine (or bound) the number of intersections as a function of the parameters, but that is a much harder problem.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
  • #13
FactChecker said:
Right. Is the problem statement complete and accurate?
Sorry, you're correct. I didn't paste the original question at the start. The exact problem as it appears in the Math book is as below. From what I have gathered so far from all the replies is that the answer to this exact question is none of the given options since as the curvature of the circle decreases the number of intersections increases.

1752408152401.webp
and
 
  • #15
vcsharp2003 said:
Sorry, you're correct. I didn't paste the original question at the start. The exact problem as it appears in the Math book is as below. From what I have gathered so far from all the replies is that the answer to this exact question is none of the given options since as the curvature of the circle decreases the number of intersections increases.

View attachment 363154and
Is anyone else appalled by the syntax of this question? Is (e) a correct answer? I cannot decide.
@vcsharp2003 What is the book and who publishes it ? Bring out the pitards!
I am reminded of Prof. Feynman's tale: https://rangevoting.org/FeynTexts.html
 
Last edited:
  • #16
hutchphd said:
Is anyone else appalled by the syntax of this question? Is (e) a correct answer? I cannot decide.
@vcsharp2003 What is the book and who publishes it ? Bring out the pitards!
I am reminded of Prof. Feynman's tale: https://rangevoting.org/FeynTexts.html
Until you mentioned it, I didn't notice that it was ambiguous. I took it as "given all possible circles, what is the maximum number of times any circle can intersect the sine function." So answer e would be my answer. (Maybe even this is ambiguous.)
Is there a way to ask it that leaves no room for ambiguity?
 
  • #17
FactChecker said:
Is there a way to ask it that leaves no room for ambiguity?
I'll give it a go...

What is the maximum number of times (##N## ) a circle* can intersect the graph of ##y=\sin x##?
a)##N \le 2## b) ##N\le 4## c)##N \le 6## d) ##N \le 8## e)##N \gt 16##

*It’s implicit that all possible values for the centre and radius of the circle are permissble.

Edit - corrections
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003 and SammyS
  • #18
I would say ""out of all possible circles, what is the maximum number of times any circle can intersect the sine function."
IMO, that makes it explicit that all circles are to be considered.
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
  • #19
hutchphd said:
Is anyone else appalled by the syntax of this question? Is (e) a correct answer? I cannot decide.
@vcsharp2003 What is the book and who publishes it ? Bring out the pitards!
I am reminded of Prof. Feynman's tale: https://rangevoting.org/FeynTexts.html
Its a Math book titled Mathematics 11 that is used in Grade 11 in schools of Ontario, Canada. The publisher is McGraw-Hill Ryerson and it has multiple authors from various school boards of Ontario, Canada.

You can see a full legal copy of it at the Internet Archive using the following link: https://archive.org/details/mcgrawhillryerso0000unse_d3o2, but to view the whole book you need to first register on their webiste and then click on the Borrow button. The challenge problem that I posted can be found on p 420.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
It's tricky to state that problem unambiguously. I wouldn't be too hard on them for any ambiguity.
 
  • #21
It seems that none of the options given in the challenge problem under post#13 is true.
I counted the number of intersections in post#10 to be greater than 16.
I also counted the number of intersections as 2 in post#3 .

In that case, shouldn't this challenge problem be wrong?
 
  • #22
First off, sorry for becoming unavailable. My follow-on hint would have been to try b=r-1, r>10.

But regarding ambiguity - Here's how it was originally stated by the OP:
vcsharp2003 said:
The question is asking for the number of different solutions to the following two equations.
$$y=\sin{x}$$
$$(x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2$$
I suppose you could interpret that as "find the function of a, b, and r that will the return number of solutions".
And that is certainly a tractable problem.

But even without knowing what the original verbatim test question and 5 optional answers were, I presumed that we were looking for a count and a maximum at that.

There were two reasons for this:
1) If a function was expected, the norm would be to explicitly request a function - unless the context for a function is very compelling.
2) "Different" can be also be interpreted in several ways - but it suggests looking for a maximum.

But once the verbatim test question and the 5 options have been provided, I see no ambiguity. There is no direct English-to-Math translation, but "can" generally implies what is possible - and in this case a maximum would imply a range from 0 to that maximum (all that "can" be).
Also, all of the optional answers talk about counts, not functions. None of the options allow for "12", so we are not being asked about all possible solutions - we are being asked about a subset.
Does the option "at most 8 times" mean that "8" plays a special role in this problem? If not, then selected subsets could yield answers of only 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. But in those cases, "at most 4 times" would equally apply. So, the combination of "at most 4 times" and "at most 8 times" very strongly suggest that they are referring to a situation where the "4" or "8" are tied to the solution. There is, however, only one "more than" option (ie, "more than 16 times"), so the "16" does not need to be special.
 
  • #23
vcsharp2003 said:
It seems that none of the options given in the challenge problem under post#13 is true.
I counted the number of intersections in post#10 to be greater than 16.
I also counted the number of intersections as 2 in post#3 .

In that case, shouldn't this challenge problem be wrong?
It is only wrong if you assume the most trivial interpretation of the question. I would not do that.

Suppose you interpret the question to be: "Given a circle, what is the maximum number of intersections?".
Then you can be given a circle like ##x^2+(y+1000)^2=1##, with no intersections. I think that is too trivial to be the correct interpretation.

On the other hand, suppose you interpret the question to be: "Given all possible circles, what is the largest number of intersections that any of them have?"
Then e: More than 16 is the correct answer.
 
  • #24
FactChecker said:
Then e: More than 16 is the correct answer.
i still decry thae question.
More than 16 is a (not the!) correct answer. I think it unwise to include an example whose complications are almost entirely semantic (although this discussion, if engendered, would be educational to potential writers of textbooks. ) The math content rapidly becomes overwhelmed however.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
  • #25
hutchphd said:
i still decry thae question.
More than 16 is a (not the!) correct answer. I think it unwise to include an example whose complications are almost entirely semantic (although this discussion, if engendered, would be educational to potential writers of textbooks. ) The math content rapidly becomes overwhelmed however.
I agree. But I don't think the authors realized the ambiguity, so I am not inclined to be very critical of them.
 
  • #26
They are writing a textbook. It is their job to worry about clarity. A
nd where were the editors.....? I am very critical. More so because this example is purely of their own choosing
 
  • Like
Likes vcsharp2003
  • #27
hutchphd said:
They are writing a textbook. It is their job to worry about clarity. A
nd where were the editors.....? I am very critical. More so because this example is purely of their own choosing
Proofreading a book is a tedious, endless, thankless, job. No matter how long and hard you try, some errors remain. IMO, there must be something demonic going on. ;-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top