Intersection of a paraboloid and a plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the intersection of the paraboloid defined by the equation z = x^2 + y^2 and the plane described by x - 2y = 0. The correct parametrization of the curve of intersection is established as x = 2t, y = t, and z = 5t^2. The method is verified through plotting in Maple, confirming that the parametrization lies within both surfaces. A follow-up question regarding a more complex intersection involving the plane 2x - y - 3z = 15 and the paraboloid 3z = (x^2)/16 + (y^2)/9 indicates challenges with imaginary numbers, suggesting a need for a different approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Familiarity with the concepts of paraboloids and planes in three-dimensional space
  • Proficiency in using Maple for plotting mathematical functions
  • Knowledge of solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive parametric equations for intersections of surfaces
  • Study the method for handling complex numbers in intersection problems
  • Explore the use of Maple for visualizing three-dimensional surfaces and their intersections
  • Investigate the intersection of more complex surfaces, such as hyperboloids and planes
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians working with three-dimensional geometry, and anyone interested in visualizing and solving surface intersection problems.

Stevecgz
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Question: Consider the intersection of the paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2 with the plane x - 2y = 0. Find a parametrization of the curve of intersection and verify that it lies in each surface.

How I went about it:

x = 2y
z = (2y)^2 + y^2 = 5y^2

Set y = t, then

x = 2t
y = t
z = 5t^2

I don't know that my answer is wrong, I'm just not certain if I am going about it the correct way. If someone could let me know I would appreciate it. Thanks.

Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I plotted both the parabolaoid and the plane in one plot and the parametric spacecurve in another plot (using Maple) and they do appear to agree, also your work is without flaw. Good job.
 
Yes, it really is that simple!
 
Thanks for the replys.

Steve
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, it really is that simple!

If only the rest of calculus were this easy :smile:
 
A similar question - but more variables are present:

Find the intersection of the plane 2x-y-3z=15 and the paraboloid 3z=(x^2)/16 + (y^2)/9

I was unable to use the above method because of the "z" variable in the plane equation. Can I still use the above method? Or is something else necessary?

I plugged 3z=15+2x-y into the equation for the paraboloid and started getting imaginary numbers, was that correct?

"At the end of the number line is a rainbow made out of nothing but primes..."
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K